Read this topic from the beginning...andywoolloo wrote:i haven't seen three yet and how are u all doing the screen capture?
Jools
Read this topic from the beginning...andywoolloo wrote:i haven't seen three yet and how are u all doing the screen capture?
On a PC, you'd use the PrintScreen button on the keyboard, and then open a drawing program (MS Paint for example) and paste in the copy of the screen.andywoolloo wrote:i haven't seen three yet and how are u all doing the screen capture?
For those using Apple (Mac) you press cmd, shift, 4. You then drag the mouse to create the rectangle/square and let go. It is saved onto the desktop. Apple rules!andywoolloo wrote:i haven't seen three yet and how are u all doing the screen capture?
Yes, we have eight so far so...(murmuring and counting with fingers) that means six left. So far we have:Richard B wrote:Just the royal plec, glass cat, hypancistrus, lancer, adolfoi & H.Flavus to go???
OK, well the simple answer is upgrade to MSIE7 (which is a lot better anyway) but I will look into it.Kostas wrote:Hi Jools!
I am browsing with Internet Explorer 6,just as Martin...There was a time when i was seeing them correctly,with transparent backgrounds,when you had first putted them but some days latter they started showing that way without me changing any settings...
Remember when the forum trio of cats were not changing, well the reason I'd set them to be fixed was that using the dynamic set was actually quite hard to do IF you're using MSIE6 or lower AND the transparency is to work. Anyway, I've found a way around it and so it should now work in all browsers.Jools wrote:OK, well the simple answer is upgrade to MSIE7 (which is a lot better anyway) but I will look into it.Kostas wrote:Hi Jools!
I am browsing with Internet Explorer 6,just as Martin...There was a time when i was seeing them correctly,with transparent backgrounds,when you had first putted them but some days latter they started showing that way without me changing any settings...
Jools
Looks like this maybe temporary, but if you're still getting this error, please post it in the bugs section. I've already done too much "off topic" stuff in here...loachy_406 wrote:
They represented catfish that didn't commonly get featured, a few favourites and some enigmatic species. I also avoided species used by other organisations at the time that I knew of.Alan wrote:OK, to get back on topic, why did you choose those 14 catfish, and why "limit" it to 14?
Same style? Well, I'm open to any offers but I don't want to offend someone who's tried very hard but to my eyes the work isn't similar enough.Richard B wrote:Jools -maybe there is someone who's a "regular" in the forums who could do a few more if you wanted? It might be worth asking???
I always thought this one was .Hypancistrus contradens - I had to have a small, spotted pl*co and Hypancistrus zebra seemed passe and is used by countless other organisations.
It's fine, I only ever saw it once. I was just curious as to what it is.Jools wrote:Looks like this maybe temporary, but if you're still getting this error, please post it in the bugs section.