Page 1 of 1

Satan’s Skeleton Revealed: 3-D imaging of the widemouth blindcat skull

Posted: 25 Oct 2017, 19:15
by bekateen
Lundberg, John G., Hendrickson, Dean A., Luckenbill, Kyle, & Arce H., Mariangeles. 2017. Satan’s Skeleton Revealed. Oral presentation at the annual Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists in Austin, Texas, USA (http://conferences.k-state.edu/JMIH-Austin-2017/). doi:10.15781/T2Q23RG37.

https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/61885

Link to PDF of oral presentation: HERE

Link to 3-D video animation of skull morphology: HERE
ABSTRACT
Hubbs & Bailey 1947, the widemouth blindcat, is endemic to the deep Edwards Aquifer below San Antonio, TX. Monotypic Satan is one of four subterranean ictalurids, , Prietella pheatophila [sic] and P. lundbergi, that all exhibit common features of stygomorphs: loss of eyes and pigmentation, hypertrophy of some chemo and mechanosensory systems, small size, and variously reduced musculoskeletal system. Each species is distinctive in its own ways, and hypotheses about their phylogenetic positions range from separate ancestries of each scattered among the lineages of epigean ictalurids to exclusive monophyly of a strictly subterranean clade. Specimens of Satan are rare, thus we used highresolution CT scans to develop the first detailed, richly illustrated descriptive and comparative study of its skeleton. Satan exhibits typical and singular reductive features plus complex structures, e.g. 3 novel symphyses closing the posterior cranial fontanel; an unusually deep temporal fossa; and an ornately shaped dorsal fin locking spinelet. Satan shares 15 synapomorphies with other ictalurid troglobites: the stygomorphisms plus bone and joint reductions. Satan shares 11 synapomorphies with , including increased numbers of cephalic sensory pores and paired fin rays, and several features associated with predatory suction feeding: wide gape, depressed head, expanded branchiostegal and opercular membranes and anterior extension of epaxial muscle. Incomplete character information, including lack of molecular data for Satan and Trogloglanis, poor quality of available skeletal preparations for Trogloglanis and Prietella, and uncertain identifications of some specimens of Prietella impede construction of a complete dataset for phylogenetic analysis.
CLOG links to relevant species:





Re: Satan’s Skeleton Revealed: 3-D imaging of the widemouth blindcat skull

Posted: 25 Oct 2017, 21:45
by Jools
John will be a keynote speaker at next years' CSG convention - perhaps he will tell us something also of this species / research then.

https://www.catfishstudygroup.org/core/ ... n_2018.php

Jools

Re: Satan’s Skeleton Revealed: 3-D imaging of the widemouth blindcat skull

Posted: 25 Oct 2017, 23:41
by Lycosid
Real question: when are we getting an STL file so I can print the skull on my 3D printer?

Re: Satan’s Skeleton Revealed: 3-D imaging of the widemouth blindcat skull

Posted: 31 Oct 2017, 00:44
by bekateen

Re: Satan’s Skeleton Revealed: 3-D imaging of the widemouth blindcat skull

Posted: 31 Oct 2017, 11:20
by lfinley58
Morning Eric,

Good Stuff! I have one question though: Why is this in Speak Easy and not Taxonomy and Science?

Lee

Re: Satan’s Skeleton Revealed: 3-D imaging of the widemouth blindcat skull

Posted: 31 Oct 2017, 14:03
by bekateen
Hi Lee,

Good question! In fact, originally I posted this in the Taxonomy & Science News (T&SN) forum, then overnight it was deleted (but not by me).

The only other time that's happened to me was when I put a post in the T&SN and afterward I was told by an admin that it belonged in Speak Easy. So I wondered if the fact that this post was about a conference presentation instead of a published article, maybe it didn't qualify for T&SN.

So the next morning, when I discovered its deletion from T&SN, I rewrote the post in Speak Easy.

If it should be in T&SN, perhaps an @admin could move this post and combine it with your follow-up post on the article?

Cheers, Eric

Re: Satan’s Skeleton Revealed: 3-D imaging of the widemouth blindcat skull

Posted: 31 Oct 2017, 14:16
by lfinley58
Hi Eric,
Sounds good to me. There are increasingly potential good materials on the net that may not qualify as a published source but are worth covering on the site (as you did). And, catfish science is catfish science wherever it might appear - ergo T&SN would be the place for them (in my opinion, of course). That makes two of us so far.
Lee