New Paravandellia

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12370
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 884
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 419
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

New Paravandellia

Post by Silurus »

Henschel, E, MJ Bernt, JN Baskin, RE Schmidt and NK Lujan, 2021. Osteology-focused redescription and description of the blood-feeding candirus Paracanthopoma parva and Paravandellia alleynei sp.n. (Trichomycteridae: Vandelliinae). Journal of Fish Biology doi: 10.1111/jfb.14930

Abstract
This study resolves a significant impediment to taxonomy of the Neotropical endemic hematophagous candirus by providing the first high‐resolution, CT‐based osteological descriptions of type and non‐type specimens of Paracanthopoma parva, type species of the genus. We also describe the distinctive new species Paravandellia alleynei based on specimens that were previously misidentified as Parac. parva in the only taxonomic study of that species since its 1935 description. Paracanthopoma parva is distinguished from all nominal congeners by its parietosupraoccipital and caudal skeleton morphology and by various meristics, including numbers of median premaxillary teeth, vertebrae, and procurrent and principal caudal‐fin rays. Paravandellia alleynei differs from both nominal congeners (Parav. oxyptera, and Parav. phaneronema) by the unique morphology of its maxilla, mesethmoid, and opercular apparatus, relative position of the pelvic‐ and anal‐fin origins, orientation of the opercular odontodes, and by various meristics, including numbers of vertebrae, median premaxillary teeth, medial teeth on premaxilla, branchiostegal rays, opercular and interopercular odontodes, distal claw‐like premaxillary teeth, dorsal‐fin rays, and dentary teeth. This is the first species of Paravandellia recognized from Guyana and the Essequibo River basin. It is currently known only from two type specimens from the lower Essequibo River basin and 43 non‐type specimens from the upper Branco River basin. By providing the first skeletal observations for type specimens of the type species Paracanthopoma parva and for topotypic specimens of all three nominal species of Paravandellia, we clarify and confirm the diagnosis of Parac. parva, and establish a robust foundation for ongoing taxonomic revisions of these two small‐sized and species‐poor, yet trans‐continentally distributed genera, both of which contain considerable unrecognized diversity.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”