Non valid spp update new entries

Incorrect ID? New info to be added, taxonomic revisions and any kind of changes to the data we currently hold in here please!
Post Reply
Marc van Arc
Expert
Posts: 5038
Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
My articles: 20
My images: 61
My catfish: 9
Spotted: 35
Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Non valid spp update new entries

Post by Marc van Arc »

As I'm not allowed to delete spp, here's a list of at least doubtful spp I've come across while adding synonyms.

Comments welcome. If someone decides to delete a species, pls also delete it from this posting, so in the end the posting itself can be deleted as well.



User avatar
Jools
Expert
Posts: 15993
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
My articles: 197
My images: 941
My catfish: 238
My cats species list: 87 (i:13, k:1)
My BLogs: 7 (i:7, p:202)
My Wishlist: 23
Spotted: 447
Location 1: Middle Earth,
Location 2: Scotland
Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
Contact:

Re: Non valid spp update new entries

Post by Jools »

Just a further note on process, don't assume that if I accept a data submission for these then that means I think it's valid or not valid. It's just easier to accept ones and get the submission done before it is moved around (potentially).

Jools
User avatar
Shane
Expert
Posts: 4590
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 22:12
My articles: 69
My images: 161
My catfish: 75
My cats species list: 4 (i:0, k:0)
My aquaria list: 4 (i:4)
Spotted: 99
Location 1: Tysons
Location 2: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Non valid spp update new entries

Post by Shane »

I think it makes sense to have a running species inquirendae thread.



Mónica S. Rodriguez; Christian A. Cramer; Sandro L. Bonatto; Roberto E. Reis (2008)
Neotrop. ichthyol. vol.6 no.3 Porto Alegre 2008

Taxonomy of Ixinandria Isbrücker & Nijssen (Loricariidae: Loricariinae) based on morphological and molecular data

"We conclude that the populations are not significantly distinct and do not deserve separate species recognition, and we place I. montebelloi in the synonymy of I. steinbachi."

Discussed here
http://www.planetcatfish.com/forum/view ... 38&t=34113
"My journey is at an end and the tale is told. The reader who has followed so faithfully and so far, they have the right to ask, what do I bring back? It can be summed up in three words. Concentrate upon Uganda."
Winston Churchill, My African Journey
User avatar
Shane
Expert
Posts: 4590
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 22:12
My articles: 69
My images: 161
My catfish: 75
My cats species list: 4 (i:0, k:0)
My aquaria list: 4 (i:4)
Spotted: 99
Location 1: Tysons
Location 2: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Non valid spp update new entries

Post by Shane »

I am not finding the paper that invalidated the following:



Leiocassis crassirostris Regan, 1913
Liocassis crassirostris Regan, 1913b: 552. Type locality: Kiatiang-fu, Sze Chuen, China. Syntypes (2): BMNH
1891.6.13.23.
Distribution: Sichuan, China.

Catelog of Fishes notes:
Current status: Valid as Leiocassis crassilabris Regan 1913. Bagridae. Distribution: Sichuan, China. Habitat: freshwater.

Fishbase also includes it as valid.

I am aware of HH's 2005 paper restricting Leiocassis to L. aculeatus, L. collinus, L. hosii, L. micropogon, L. poecilopterus, and L. tenebricus, but subsequent literature (Ferrearis 2007) did not restrict the genus.

Is there a post 2007 paper I am not finding? I realize that there is a distinct possibility that I am.

-Shane
"My journey is at an end and the tale is told. The reader who has followed so faithfully and so far, they have the right to ask, what do I bring back? It can be summed up in three words. Concentrate upon Uganda."
Winston Churchill, My African Journey
User avatar
Shane
Expert
Posts: 4590
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 22:12
My articles: 69
My images: 161
My catfish: 75
My cats species list: 4 (i:0, k:0)
My aquaria list: 4 (i:4)
Spotted: 99
Location 1: Tysons
Location 2: Virginia
Contact:

Re: Non valid spp update new entries

Post by Shane »



Limatulichthys petleyi (Fowler, 1940)
Loricaria punctata Regan, 1904b: 285, pl. 17 (fig. 1). Type locality: Manaos, Rio Negro, middle Amazon, and Porto
do Moz, lower Amazon. Syntypes: BMNH 1893.4.24.18, and at MCZ. Preoccupied by Loricaria punctata
Kner, 1854 [now Pterygoplichthys punctatus], apparently not replaced.
Rhineloricaria petleyi Fowler, 1940a: 243, figs. 36–38. Type locality: Ucayali River basin, Contamana, Peru. Holotype:
ANSP 68661.
Loricariichthys parnahybae Fowler, 1941a: 161, figs. 69–71. Type locality: Rio Parnahyba, Therizina, Piauhy [Brazil].
Holotype: ANSP 69451.
Distribution: Amazon, Tocantins and Parnaíba River basins (Ferraris, 2003c).

Removed from the synonymy of Limatulichthys griseus (Eigenmann, 1909) by Isbrücker (2001) and this decision supported by Ferraris (2007). Was there a later paper placing it back in synonymy?

-Shane
"My journey is at an end and the tale is told. The reader who has followed so faithfully and so far, they have the right to ask, what do I bring back? It can be summed up in three words. Concentrate upon Uganda."
Winston Churchill, My African Journey
User avatar
Jools
Expert
Posts: 15993
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
My articles: 197
My images: 941
My catfish: 238
My cats species list: 87 (i:13, k:1)
My BLogs: 7 (i:7, p:202)
My Wishlist: 23
Spotted: 447
Location 1: Middle Earth,
Location 2: Scotland
Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
Contact:

Re: Non valid spp update new entries

Post by Jools »

Just a wee note to say that, irrespective of outcome, this is great to dig into and each entry should have some of the detail recorded in it. Five years hence we will all have forgotten the why and why nots of each case.

Jools
Post Reply

Return to “Cat-eLog data issues”