L229

Incorrect ID? New info to be added, taxonomic revisions and any kind of changes to the data we currently hold in here please!
Post Reply
User avatar
The.Dark.One
Posts: 1504
Joined: 03 Feb 2003, 20:24
I've donated: $26.00!
My articles: 1
My images: 20
My cats species list: 41 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 16
Location 1: Castleford, West Yorkshire, England
Location 2: Castleford

L229

Post by The.Dark.One »

Images 13-15 of are IMO.
User avatar
MatsP
Posts: 21038
Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
My articles: 4
My images: 28
My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:97)
Spotted: 187
Location 1: North of Cambridge
Location 2: England.

Re: L229

Post by MatsP »

It was my impression than images 9-16 show one and the same fish?

--
Mats
User avatar
Jools
Expert
Posts: 15989
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
My articles: 197
My images: 941
My catfish: 238
My cats species list: 87 (i:13, k:1)
My BLogs: 7 (i:7, p:202)
My Wishlist: 23
Spotted: 447
Location 1: Middle Earth,
Location 2: Scotland
Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
Contact:

Re: L229

Post by Jools »

I tend to agree with Steve. The background here is they are all from one batch of fishes from Michael at Imazoo. So, someone that knows what they're talking about but isn't a pleco specialist. I reckon as young fishes they look very similar. The depth of the body on the back half of the fish gives it away though. Thinking about it, the first time I saw both fishes was in an exporter in Iquitos, Peru - so they are likely exported together.

I think images 13,14 & 15 should be moved out to the .

Jools
Post Reply

Return to “Cat-eLog data issues”