About filtration

Post pictures of your beloved catfish aquaria here. Also good for pictures of your (cat)fish rooms or equipment discussions. If you are posting pictures of identified catfish, please do so in the appropriate husbandry and reproduction forum above.
Post Reply
Bas Pels
Posts: 2898
Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 20:35
My images: 1
My cats species list: 28 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 7
Location 1: the Netherlands
Location 2: Nijmegen the Netherlands
Interests: Central American and Uruguayan fishes

Re: About filtration

Post by Bas Pels »

Basically, you want this filter to carry your rockwork. That is, rather heavy stones.

If I look at the plastic, I wonder whether I woult trust this to carry say a 5 kg (some 11 pounds) stone.

I myself use styropore plates (sold for insulation) of 2 cm thick for precisely this purpose. I use tiles over them in order to keep them from floating, but these tiles also protect the styropore from any rocks
cats have whiskers
Viktor Jarikov
Posts: 5254
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 20:11
My images: 11
My cats species list: 25 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 4
Location 1: Naples, FL
Location 2: USA

Re: About filtration

Post by Viktor Jarikov »

To me it sounds like you will have problems vacuuming the substrate and getting all the crud out. If you will have a layer of sand, I am not sure why you'd need an additional weight-distributing / safety contraption.
Thebiggerthebetter
fish-story.com
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

Viktor Jarikov wrote: 04 Mar 2020, 14:51 To me it sounds like you will have problems vacuuming the substrate and getting all the crud out. If you will have a layer of sand, I am not sure why you'd need an additional weight-distributing / safety contraption.
As far as I am aware sand is not considered a sufficient support for heavy rocks. The rocks will settle on the glass bottom creating point loads.
Yes, it will be difficult to vacuum under the rock piles in any case?
Viktor Jarikov
Posts: 5254
Joined: 26 Jan 2010, 20:11
My images: 11
My cats species list: 25 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 4
Location 1: Naples, FL
Location 2: USA

Re: About filtration

Post by Viktor Jarikov »

In my mind I thought the fish are not diggers (perhaps I am wrong) and that you'd be lifting the rocks and vacuuming under them and setting the rocks back on the sand surface.

If you think of a more permanent installation, then perhaps you are right and you could set up tiles under the rocks, with or without the styrofoam mentioned by Bas, but he and other "substraters" should know better... because the last time I used substrate in my tanks was a decade ago... and even then I have never used sand, always fine or medium gravel. I have never bothered with any weight distribution of the heavy furniture.

If I am not mistaken, the bottom glass panes of small to medium (or all?) fish tanks are tempered. They can withstand a LOT of point load. Hit it with a hammer almost as hard as you can, you won't break it or will be surprised at the force you will need to finally break it... or such is my experience anyway.
Thebiggerthebetter
fish-story.com
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

Somehow I had missed Bas reply.
I don't have access to large rocks so I will stack smaller ones in piles to create hidy holes.I have used styrofoam before but had the problem of it floating.
I'll see what I can find in the way of tiles?
Kilo_SSK
Posts: 4
Joined: 29 Mar 2020, 19:40
Location 1: Saratov, Russia
Location 2: Namur, Belgium

Re: About filtration

Post by Kilo_SSK »

Speaking of filtration, if I'm not mistaken, room temperature and sunlight exposure play a role in the speed at which flora develops in a fish tank, and thus, in the quality of filtration needed. The thing is that right now, I've only owned a fish tank in a room that doesn't get much sunlight, but I was planning to move to one of these flats on the Costa Blanca by late 2021/early 2022, and I've never had to care for a fish tank under that climate.
Should I be careful about something in particular, or would it be possible to keep filtrating the water of said tank at the same rate as usual?
Bas Pels
Posts: 2898
Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 20:35
My images: 1
My cats species list: 28 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 7
Location 1: the Netherlands
Location 2: Nijmegen the Netherlands
Interests: Central American and Uruguayan fishes

Re: About filtration

Post by Bas Pels »

if the tank gets too much sun AND there is enough plantfood in the water - this water might get green. Resulting in 0 visibility.

You better keep the sun out of the tank.

Further it is warmer there, but that only implies other species kept.
cats have whiskers
User avatar
Jools
Expert
Posts: 15969
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
My articles: 197
My images: 943
My catfish: 238
My cats species list: 87 (i:13, k:1)
My BLogs: 7 (i:7, p:202)
My Wishlist: 23
Spotted: 446
Location 1: Middle Earth,
Location 2: Scotland
Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
Contact:

Re: About filtration

Post by Jools »

Leave it, a siphon will be able to remove built-up debris if you wish. If you were going to put something under it, perhaps small rounded stones like you would use in a garden path or driveway?

Jools
User avatar
TwoTankAmin
Posts: 1471
Joined: 24 Apr 2008, 23:26
I've donated: $4038.00!
My cats species list: 6 (i:0, k:0)
My BLogs: 2 (i:0, p:48)
Location 1: USA
Location 2: Mt. Kisco, NY
Interests: Fish and Poker

Re: About filtration

Post by TwoTankAmin »

I am a huge fan of Mattens. I have 3 tanks which rely primarily on them. Almost as much, I like the Poret foam cubes. This is a brand and I am sure there are other brands as good, I just ended up using this one.

The hardest thing I had to learn about using massively pored foam filter media was that it does a better job of mechanical waste processing than floss. I use almost exclusively the 20 ppi foam. 10 ppi is great for intake pre-filters or in canisters with more than two layers/baskets of media. Higher ppis clog pretty fast and are best used in shrimp and fry tanks, imo. I came to the Poret Mattens and cubes because I am noe in my early 70s and the work load of 20-25 tanks had been getting more difficult in the recent years. The Poret made filtration a lot easier to keep clean and maintain without sacrificing water quality which was my goal. At one time I had over 26 running AquaClears, today I have just 14 and I plan to reduce that number in the next few weeks.

While I will not argue that a planted substrate is one of the best "filters" one can have, they are not always possible. Nor will I argue against the importance of adequate oxygenation in promoting a healthy tank. However, I have never seen evidence of an oxygen shortage in any of my tanks including the 12 or so tanks with no plants with some of them also being bare bottom.

Big foam filter media will tend to do a fair amount of denitrification and still not result in water which is short on oxygen. I do not need to do all sorts of complicated testing to know this. I use these filters in tanks where I keep Hypancistrus species breeding and growing out. I have a lot of Xingu river fish and they live in water temps from the low 80s F to bouts of time at 90F+. This water temp tends to hold less oxygen than cooler water. But the fish have a need for high oxygen levels. My plecos do not die very often, do grow nicely and do reproduce successfully, QED the water must be OK in terms of oxygen levels being adequate and nitrogen levels being almost absent (i.e. not testable without expensive lab equipment).

The other thing it took me a while to learn was that filtration and circulation in a tank are not the same thing. For most in the hobby, their filter(s) adequately oxygenate the water. Moreover, as noted above, the bacterial colonies will ultimately size to the available bio-load. Therefore, if there is insufficient media/filtration to handle the nitrogen, the bacteria will colonize in other places. In substrate, under rocks and wood or other decor, they will establish and multiply. And they will colonize in the greatest numbers where the things they need are most available, i.e where flow/circulation delivers them.

Rather than trying to overpower a filter to get the desired level of circulation, it makes much more sense to divide that job between different pieces of equipment. A few small pumps and/or powerheads can insure that the water in a tank gets adequate circulation rater than a single large device which might blow some fish out of the tank.

Things can circulate pretty fast. I have seen this in my 55gal. Altum angel tank which has a digital monitor that continuously reads TDS/Conductivity, Temperature and pH. Between water changes the pH, targeted to be 6.0, tends to creep up towards 6.5 Sometimes mid-week I will add muriatic acid to the tank to drop the pH. I have actually a few times dropped the pH by close to one full point (1.0) and seen this happen on the monitor in about 5 minutes or less. I do dose the acid all across the surface rather than in a single place. (Filtation on this tank is 2 AC 200s, and air driven 4x4 poret 20 ppi and a large ATI sponge.)

Finally, there is one other consideration regarding ammonia and planted v.s. non-planted tanks. The plants take in ammonium (NH4) and the bacteria prefer ammonia (NH3) which is way more toxic. Even in a higher pH tank most of the Total Ammonia (TA), which is NH3 + NH4, is in the form of NH4. However, it is possible to remove virtually 100% of TA if one removes exclusively one or the other form. As soon as one form is removed, the remaining form converts partially and restores the balance for that water's specific parameters.

Plants can consume NH4 way more rapidly than bacteria/archaea can consume NH4. However, aquatic plants are covered in nitrifying bacteria. Moreover, some plants will transport oxygen down and out through their roots to turn an anaerobic space aerobic which encourages the colonization of the nitrifiers. So, no matter how many plants may be in a tank, there will still be some amount of nitrifying bacteria at work. On the other hand, it is possible for a tank with no plants or algae and even no substrate to process ammonia solely by the microorganisms. Nature always finds a way.

All that said. I still have a number of heavily planted tanks that I enjoy. When it comes to fish keeping, there is more than one way to skin a cat (just an expression). My fish have all of their skin/scales/scutes. :)
No one has ever become poor by giving.” Anonymous
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”" Daniel Patrick Moynihan
"The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
User avatar
Lycosid
Posts: 191
Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 21:18
My cats species list: 7 (i:0, k:2)
Spotted: 4
Location 1: United States
Location 2: North Carolina

Re: About filtration

Post by Lycosid »

TwoTankAmin wrote: 31 Mar 2020, 17:08 I am a huge fan of Mattens. I have 3 tanks which rely primarily on them. Almost as much, I like the Poret foam cubes. This is a brand and I am sure there are other brands as good, I just ended up using this one.
I'll second this. I have a whole aquatics lab running off Mattenfilters, and we never have water quality issues.
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

TwoTankAmin wrote: 31 Mar 2020, 17:08 Big foam filter media will tend to do a fair amount of denitrification and still not result in water which is short on oxygen. I do not need to do all sorts of complicated testing to know this. I use these filters in tanks where I keep Hypancistrus species breeding and growing out. I have a lot of Xingu river fish and they live in water temps from the low 80s F to bouts of time at 90F+. This water temp tends to hold less oxygen than cooler water. But the fish have a need for high oxygen levels. My plecos do not die very often, do grow nicely and do reproduce successfully, QED the water must be OK in terms of oxygen levels being adequate and nitrogen levels being almost absent (i.e. not testable without expensive lab equipment).
Hello again!
I am slowly learning and getting to grips with the topic and at the moment I have three tanks recently set up with different approaches.

In the first sentence quoted above, do you mean nitrification instead of denitrification?
User avatar
TwoTankAmin
Posts: 1471
Joined: 24 Apr 2008, 23:26
I've donated: $4038.00!
My cats species list: 6 (i:0, k:0)
My BLogs: 2 (i:0, p:48)
Location 1: USA
Location 2: Mt. Kisco, NY
Interests: Fish and Poker

Re: About filtration

Post by TwoTankAmin »

No, I meant denitrification. There are a type of bacteria called facultative anaerobes (or aerobes). These are able to function using oxygen or, when oxygen is depleted, use an alternative. For some this is nitrate. When they use nitrate the end product is nitrogen gas which returns to the atmosphere.

Because there is such a massive volume in a mattenfilter for the bacteria to form the bio-films in which they live, over time a great variety of microorganisms will colonize the foam. The result is there will be some pathways through the foam where the aerobic organisms will use all of the oxygen in the water following that pathway through the media. What there will be instead is the nitrate produce by the Nitrospira (nitrite oxidizers). When this occurs the facultative bacteria will switch from using O to NO2. The result is this nitrate never makes it back into the water column, it is broken down.

Every nitrifying bio-film will have some small parts that do the same thing, even when not using massive media. However, in such cases the amount of denitrification in the average filter is not significant and we do not even know it is occurring as our nitrates will still build up.
No one has ever become poor by giving.” Anonymous
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”" Daniel Patrick Moynihan
"The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

Thanks!
That is what I was thinking.
My plans for a Synodontis tank were put on hold due to the recent restrictions on movement so in the meantime I got a group of C. moorii for the 100 gallon.
I also installed a matten filter but since the tank was up and running I didn't want to empty it to install a corner filter I opted for a full width version. This is 50x50 cm and I was afraid 2" would be too flimsy so I doubled up and have 4" of 10 ppi across one end.
I have seven medium size fish and feed what they will eat once a day. If it is frozen mysis it is 2 cubes, if that means anything.
My impression is that the nitrates are increasing much slower than I expected and, checking the numbers now when I write this, they seem to be slowing even more as time passes. At the end of last month I had 10 ppm, did a 50% water change. A few days later I measured 3 ppm and am now at 5 ppm.
I concluded that there must be some denitrification going on somewhere but that would mean water with 6 mg/l oxygen going in and somewhere within those 4" reaching 0,2 mg/l which sounds incredible but I haven't got a clue to how much ammonia can be converted with 1 mg oxygen.
dw1305
Posts: 1076
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 11:57
Location 1: Corsham, UK
Location 2: Bath, UK
Interests: Natural History, Ecology, Plants, Biotopes, Taxonomy, Nitrification, Cricket & Northern Soul

Re: About filtration

Post by dw1305 »

Hi all,
Boris wrote: 29 Jul 2020, 20:25 .......but I haven't got a clue to how much ammonia can be converted with 1 mg oxygen.
As molar values it is NH4+ + 2O2 and as mass its 1.00 NH4 + 3.56 O2.
Boris wrote: 29 Jul 2020, 20:25 I had 10 ppm, did a 50% water change. A few days later I measured 3 ppm and am now at 5 ppm.
I'm a bit wary of nitrate test kits. Because all nitrate compounds are soluble you have to reduce nitrate (NO3-) to nitrite (NO2-) before you can form an insoluble coloured compound. There also some issues with Ion Selective Electrodes, mainly interference from other monovalent anions.

cheers Darrel
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

mg/l is mass but what is ppm, is it mass, volume or molar?

Yes, I know you have cautioned about hobbyist test kits but they do give a trend which follows prediction. After a water change they show a steady increase until the next WC and when you start up a new tank you get the increase-decrease curves on NH, NO2 and NO3 so i think they are useful for the purpose?
Bas Pels
Posts: 2898
Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 20:35
My images: 1
My cats species list: 28 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 7
Location 1: the Netherlands
Location 2: Nijmegen the Netherlands
Interests: Central American and Uruguayan fishes

Re: About filtration

Post by Bas Pels »

As ppm stands for parts per million, one would assume it refers to a molar - 1 micromol of something per mole of something else.

The reality is different, ppm is most often read, by aquarists, as mg per liter. A millionth of the mass

I got to admit, it is rather distracting, after all, a liter of water is 55.52 mol of water. Adding to that 135,5 mg of cupper (II) chloride, that is 1 millimole, would give 1/55,52 or 0,01801 ppm, particle based

But in mass, it is 65 mg of cupper ions in 1 liter. Thus 65 mg/l or 65 ppm mass based

Personally, graduated in chemistry, I never use ppm, as it is quite confusing.
cats have whiskers
User avatar
TwoTankAmin
Posts: 1471
Joined: 24 Apr 2008, 23:26
I've donated: $4038.00!
My cats species list: 6 (i:0, k:0)
My BLogs: 2 (i:0, p:48)
Location 1: USA
Location 2: Mt. Kisco, NY
Interests: Fish and Poker

Re: About filtration

Post by TwoTankAmin »

I was pretty much taught what Darrel said about nitrate testing. I was also taught that the nitrate kit is most inaccurate in the 0 - 20 ppm range.

Think about how many routes water can take through a matten set-up. Then consider the fact that the bio-film does not form uniformly inside all that foam. The result is in one place there is lots of O left in some of the water exiting the matten and in another place it follows a pathway where the O gets used up before it can exit. Because the facultative bacteria can switch between oxygen and nitrate, where inside the foam denitrification occurs can change.

I was also taught that one of the things that occurs inside a matten is it will deal with a lot of the waste that has the potential to cloud the water and/or to break down into ammonia. Some of the organisms inside the matten consume organic waste before it can become ammonia which needs to be handled via a different process. This, of course, does not result in nitrate.

it is one thing to talk about the world of microorganisms, it is another actually to wrap one's mind around a totally invisible universe of these things inside our tanks. However, "the proof is in the pudding." When we see our water is always clear and nitrate etc. appears to be lower and the fish are healthy and even spawning and the offspring are thriving, something good must be happening.
No one has ever become poor by giving.” Anonymous
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”" Daniel Patrick Moynihan
"The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

This thread has links to threads with links so I am not sure where I read it but somewhere, I think it was Darrel, mentioned "offgassing through a plenum"?
There are no results when I search this forum for either plenum nor Novak but are you familiar with Dr. Kevin Novak?
He advocates having a plenum (gap) between the substrate and the bottom glass. The aim is to eliminate anaerobic areas and to avoid the sulfate reducing bacteria.
It can also promote the facultative anaerobes and denitrification to nitrogen gas which I think was meant in the quote above?
I have used the under gravel filter I had to create such a plenum under 2" of fine sand in the 100 G.The lift tube from the UGF is led through the matten filter so the slight low pressure created by the MF works toward a very slow downward movement through the sand.

What are your thoughts on this?
dw1305
Posts: 1076
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 11:57
Location 1: Corsham, UK
Location 2: Bath, UK
Interests: Natural History, Ecology, Plants, Biotopes, Taxonomy, Nitrification, Cricket & Northern Soul

Re: About filtration

Post by dw1305 »

Hi all,
Boris wrote: 30 Jul 2020, 16:45There are no results when I search this forum for either plenum nor Novak but are you familiar with Dr. Kevin Novak? What are your thoughts on this?
I am, my thoughts are that he doesn't understand why his "UKAPS: biocenosis buckets are successful, or how they work.". Unfortunately he has removed a lot of the posts, picture and videos from his blog. I was interested in talking to him, but he was less interested in talking to me.
TwoTankAmin wrote: 30 Jul 2020, 16:41.....I think about how many routes water can take through a matten set-up. Then consider the fact that the bio-film does not form uniformly inside all that foam. The result is in one place there is lots of O2 left in some of the water exiting the matten and in another place it follows a pathway where the O2 gets used up before it can exit. Because the facultative bacteria can switch between oxygen and nitrate, where inside the foam denitrification occurs can change.........
it is one thing to talk about the world of microorganisms, it is another actually to wrap one's mind around a totally invisible universe of these things inside our tanks. However, "the proof is in the pudding." When we see our water is always clear and nitrate etc. appears to be lower and the fish are healthy and even spawning and the offspring are thriving, something good must be happening.
My guess is that is what is happening.

It is worth listening to Stephan Tanner, who is <"linked in earlier in the thread">.

Also have a look at <"Deep gravel....."> (also linked in earlier). It is quite a long thread but it will repay reading.

cheers Darrel
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

TwoTankAmin wrote: 30 Jul 2020, 16:41 I was pretty much taught what Darrel said about nitrate testing. I was also taught that the nitrate kit is most inaccurate in the 0 - 20 ppm range.

I was also taught that one of the things that occurs inside a matten is it will deal with a lot of the waste that has the potential to cloud the water and/or to break down into ammonia. Some of the organisms inside the matten consume organic waste before it can become ammonia which needs to be handled via a different process. This, of course, does not result in nitrate.

However, "the proof is in the pudding." When we see our water is always clear and nitrate etc. appears to be lower and the fish are healthy and even spawning and the offspring are thriving, something good must be happening.
I am going through the "deep gravel" thread and there is so much information to digest and also some points I would like to clarify but we will have to take them bit by bit so as not to be confused.

@TwoTankAmin I am not calling you out specifically by quoting your post. It just had the right context.

I have to disagree on the nitrate tests. There is very seldom an "off" measurement or random fluctuations. If you take a measurement every other day you don't get: 3 5 10 5 15 10.. but rather a consistent 3 3 5 5 10 10 15...
Despite the inherent uncertainty they seem to work for what we use them for.

We are taught many things but have you also experienced them to be true?
I am experiencing an apparent lack of nitrates associated with my matten filter so now I can start calling it knowledge? I find that, especially with filtration, there is often very little real data behind various statements.

Something good must be happening and that is fine for this tank but in order to replicate it on future tanks I need to know exactly what is going on?

Regarding the plenum, I have divided nitrification and denitrification between the MF and the substrate. If I have well oxygenated water, do you see this as functional or does it have an inherent problem? One point could be that the substrate can not be siphoned so all waste must be processed in tank increasing BOD?
User avatar
TwoTankAmin
Posts: 1471
Joined: 24 Apr 2008, 23:26
I've donated: $4038.00!
My cats species list: 6 (i:0, k:0)
My BLogs: 2 (i:0, p:48)
Location 1: USA
Location 2: Mt. Kisco, NY
Interests: Fish and Poker

Re: About filtration

Post by TwoTankAmin »

I came to all this by a strange route. About a dozen or so years back, maybe more, I got curious about things I would see an almost any fish site. One of those was that the nitrifying bacteria in tanks die off at the rate of 10% a day w/o any ammonia. Another was one must always do massive water changes when you test an see ammonia at .25 or .50 or higher. I set out to see if I could find some science on the subject. And that led me to Google Scholar and a lot of scientific papers/articles/books.

I read a ton and even had a few email conversations with the authors. One of them was Dr. Tanner of Swiss Tropicals. He is why I have Mattenfilters and Poret foam cubes instead of the typical tanks sponge filters.

I am familiar with a lot of the basics of all this stuff but I am far from being a trained scientist. However, I am also observant. Somewhere on this site I have posted a picture of one of my tanks with a Mattenfilter. Somebody, commented on how clear the water was. This was when I first realized this fact. I am wired to notice just the reverse. I don''t need to know when a tank is going well, I need not to miss when something is going wrong :d

I must confess my initial motivation to migrate towards Mattens and Poret cubes was the result of the fact that they required cleaning much less frequently than other forms of filtration and media I was using. I am now in my early 70s and wanted to be doing less work each year without suffering any loss in water quality. I got the less work but had to settle for even cleaner water.

One last thing re nitrate tests. What I meant was not that the reading would fluctuate but that they would be inaccurate. By that I mean that given the process involved, the small sample size, how easy it is to be slightly different on drop sizes and in then in shaking the reagents, errors would be greatest in the range of 0 and 20 ppm. How much does it matter to most if they have an 80 ppm reading which is really 5 ppm higher or lower? It matters a lot more at lower concentrations. Where I think the kit is most useful is to see changes up or down. The only time I even test for nitrate is when doing a dry season where I am doing fewer water changes, I want rising TDS but not from rising nitrate.
No one has ever become poor by giving.” Anonymous
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”" Daniel Patrick Moynihan
"The good thing about science is that it’s true whether or not you believe in it." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

TwoTankAmin wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 20:23 I came to all this by a strange route.
So what was your conclusion and why the poret foam?

Pothos seems to be considered one of the best immersed plants for nitrate uptake.
I have had pothos in my big tank for a few years. At first it grew great but it eventually stopped growing but still looked healthy. I thought that it may be a lack of light but never got round to getting a grow lamp for it.
When I got the moorii they started eating at the roots. I put them in a submerged breeding box but had to cut the end to get the curled stem to an acceptable position. I waited a couple of weeks but no roots developed so I moved it to another tank with around 10 ppm nitrate for two weeks and it started growing some roots. I then moved it back to the big tank but the roots are not growing. Instead it is consuming old leaves, one by one. I think it is simply starved of nutrients due to the denitrification in the MF?
I have read somewhere that pothos doesn't grow well below 20 ppm?
Isn't new growth the only nutrient sink? If it simply "lives" it is not using much nitrates?
dw1305
Posts: 1076
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 11:57
Location 1: Corsham, UK
Location 2: Bath, UK
Interests: Natural History, Ecology, Plants, Biotopes, Taxonomy, Nitrification, Cricket & Northern Soul

Re: About filtration

Post by dw1305 »

Hi all,
Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 18:14I have to disagree on the nitrate tests. There is very seldom an "off" measurement or random fluctuations. If you take a measurement every other day you don't get: 3 5 10 5 15 10.. but rather a consistent 3 3 5 5 10 10 15...
Try diluting your tank water samples down, and see if that still holds true. It isn't that NO3 values are always wrong, they just have a certain amount of uncertainty about them.
Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 18:14 I find that, especially with filtration, there is often very little real data behind various statements.
You would need to go and look at the scientific literature on waste water treatment, aquaculture and phytoremediation.
Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 18:14Regarding the plenum, I have divided nitrification and denitrification between the MF and the substrate. If I have well oxygenated water, do you see this as functional or does it have an inherent problem? One point could be that the substrate can not be siphoned so all waste must be processed in tank increasing BOD?
I don't mind where nitrification (and potentially) denitrification occurs. The only exception is for denitrification in a canister filter, which is a recipe for disaster.

cheers Darrel
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

dw1305 wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 21:41 Try diluting your tank water samples down, and see if that still holds true. It isn't that NO3 values are always wrong, they just have a certain amount of uncertainty about them.
EDITED: If you mean measuring low concentrations then yes, I do get the same result? The biggest source of inaccuracy is that I am subjectively comparing the sample to a chart of different shades of yellow.
You would need to go and look at the scientific literature on waste water treatment, aquaculture and phytoremediation.
I mean in common aquaristics. I have not seen any data to back up the claims of what various filters and filter media have in terms of properties or capacity.
I see large sumps with several compartments, each with a different type of media. One has filter foam in sheets or cubes. The next is a fluidized bed of K1. Next has bags of ceramic rings and then bags of lava rock etc. It seems to simply be hedging your bets because you don't know which one actually works and "you can never have too much filtration"!
The ceramic rings that you got with canisters and was said to have "enormous surface area" has been replaced by the more large pored sintered glass varieties (perhaps they realized that too fine pores don't work well?) but filters like the FX6 still comes with mostly foam preinstalled. Perhaps that is a clue?
I don't mind where nitrification (and potentially) denitrification occurs. The only exception is for denitrification in a canister filter, which is a recipe for disaster.
I agree but I am asking for your opinion or "SWAG" about the plenum idea?
Also, what is a suitable flow rate through a canister filter?
If you have four baskets of media and the oxygen is depleted within the first two then the remaining two will be anoxic?

On Novak's anoxic filter, I get your point about the plants in the photo but I understand that some people have had success with it in ponds or tanks without plants so it may still work?
Reading "Mankysanke's" explanation it seems reasonable but for one thing and that is that the negative charge of the clay particles constantly draws the positive ammonia toward the center. Why doesn't the ammonia stick to the first negative ion exchange surface it hits?
If I am right and "Mankysanke" is wrong then it would work almost as well with filter foam instead of clay?
http://www.mankysanke.co.uk/html/anoxic_filtration.html
Last edited by Boris on 01 Aug 2020, 07:58, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lycosid
Posts: 191
Joined: 20 Aug 2016, 21:18
My cats species list: 7 (i:0, k:2)
Spotted: 4
Location 1: United States
Location 2: North Carolina

Re: About filtration

Post by Lycosid »

Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 22:34 Reading "Mankysanke's" explanation it seems reasonable but for one thing and that is that the negative charge of the clay particles constantly draws the positive ammonia toward the center. Why doesn't the ammonia stick to the first negative ion exchange surface it hits?
If I am right and "Mankysanke" is wrong then it would work almost as well with filter foam instead of clay?
http://www.mankysanke.co.uk/html/anoxic_filtration.html
It seems like Mankysanke is claiming that the center is more negative (and, obviously, the outside is full of positive ions) which causes the ammonia to "switch partners" constantly, moving inwards each time. This sort of behavior is possible for ionic bonds, which are not bonds between two specific atoms (normally) but between an atom and all of its oppositely-charged neighbors. Covalent bonds would require a full-blown chemical reaction to dissociate every time.

I have no idea if he's right, but this isn't an impossible thing.
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

Lycosid wrote: 01 Aug 2020, 00:32 It seems like Mankysanke is claiming that the center is more negative (and, obviously, the outside is full of positive ions) which causes the ammonia to "switch partners" constantly, moving inwards each time. This sort of behavior is possible for ionic bonds, which are not bonds between two specific atoms (normally) but between an atom and all of its oppositely-charged neighbors. Covalent bonds would require a full-blown chemical reaction to dissociate every time.

I have no idea if he's right, but this isn't an impossible thing.
So the best way to test this would be to make it as a reactor, feed it ammonia and see what happens?
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

TwoTankAmin wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 20:23 Somewhere on this site I have posted a picture of one of my tanks with a Mattenfilter. Somebody, commented on how clear the water was. This was when I first realized this fact.
Now that you say it I have also noticed that there is very little suspended particles in my tank also. When I installed the plenum/under gravel filter I anticipated a lot of waste on, and in the sand but no, not much on the surface and very fine particles stirred up from the sand. Not enough to warrant a water change!
dw1305
Posts: 1076
Joined: 22 Oct 2009, 11:57
Location 1: Corsham, UK
Location 2: Bath, UK
Interests: Natural History, Ecology, Plants, Biotopes, Taxonomy, Nitrification, Cricket & Northern Soul

Re: About filtration

Post by dw1305 »

Hi all,
Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 22:34.........I mean in common aquaristics. I have not seen any data to back up the claims of what various filters and filter media have in terms of properties or capacity.
I see large sumps with several compartments, each with a different type of media. One has filter foam in sheets or cubes. The next is a fluidized bed of K1. Next has bags of ceramic rings and then bags of lava rock etc. It seems to simply be hedging your bets because you don't know which one actually works and "you can never have too much filtration"! The ceramic rings that you got with canisters and was said to have "enormous surface area" has been replaced by the more large pored sintered glass varieties (perhaps they realized that too fine pores don't work well?) but filters like the FX6 still comes with mostly foam preinstalled.
A lot of the claims made by companies that manufacture "premium biofiltration media" are just smoke and mirrors, and would be picked apart by any scientist in seconds.There are values for Kaldnes type floating cell media, because they were developed for salmon aquaculture and have been widely used in the wastewater industry, they are designed to shed biofilm if it becomes to deep.

It isn't the media that is important it is the dissolved oxygen, microbial nitrification is very rarely limited by lack of physical media, it is limited by the amount of dissolved oxygen.
Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 22:34..... about the plenum idea?
I don't see any advantage to a plenum, but I only keep planted tanks where plant root growth is going to provide the zones of fluctuating REDOX in the rhizosphere.
Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 22:34 Also, what is a suitable flow rate through a canister filter? If you have four baskets of media and the oxygen is depleted within the first two then the remaining two will be anoxic?
That is the issue, so flow through the filter needs to be fast enough so that the water is still oxygenated when it leaves contact with the filter media. A canister filter is different from a HOB, HMF or Trickle filter, it is a sealed vessel and the only oxygen entering it is in the water.

Why would you want to attempt anaerobic denitrification in the filter, when you run the risk that ammonia and nitrite can build up in the aquarium water? If your filter is a "nitrate factory" it just shows that nitrification is effective. Worrying about nitrate is like being more concerned about the splinter in your finger and ignoring the fact that your arm is hanging off.
Boris wrote: 31 Jul 2020, 22:34On Novak's anoxic filter, I get your point about the plants in the photo but I understand that some people have had success with it in ponds or tanks without plants so it may still work? Reading "Mankysanke's" explanation it seems reasonable but for one thing and that is that the negative charge of the clay particles constantly draws the positive ammonia toward the center. Why doesn't the ammonia stick to the first negative ion exchange surface it hits? If I am right and "Mankysanke" is wrong then it would work almost as well with filter foam instead of clay? http://www.mankysanke.co.uk/html/anoxic_filtration.html
Anaerobic denitrification can work, it is used a lot in wastewater treatment, usually with a temporal or spatial separation between the processes. Plant/microbe biofiltration is potentially a lot more effective, but you need a bigger footprint for your treatment facility and you may have climatic issues in temperate zones.

In terms of the clay, you are looking at Cation Exchange Capacity, which is dependent upon both valency of the ion and its abundance in the water column, so it would be fair to say I'm dubious, because all multivalent ions are more strongly bound.

Affinity series: Cations: Al3+ > H+ > Ca2+ > Mg2+ > K+= NH4+ > Na+

cheers Darrel
Boris
Posts: 40
Joined: 14 Oct 2018, 14:34
Location 1: Sweden
Location 2: southeast coast

Re: About filtration

Post by Boris »

dw1305 wrote: 01 Aug 2020, 11:00 A lot of the claims made by companies that manufacture "premium biofiltration media" are just smoke and mirrors, and would be picked apart by any scientist in seconds.

It isn't the media that is important it is the dissolved oxygen, microbial nitrification is very rarely limited by lack of physical media, it is limited by the amount of dissolved oxygen.

That is the issue, so flow through the filter needs to be fast enough so that the water is still oxygenated when it leaves contact with the filter media. A canister filter is different from a HOB, HMF or Trickle filter, it is a sealed vessel and the only oxygen entering it is in the water.
This is exactly my point!
95%(?) of hobby fish keepers, fish store staff etc, even very experienced people, have a poor understanding of the whole "filtration" process and have no desire to try. The advertisement statements made by manufacturers not only go unchallenged but become truths spread and defended within the fish community. Once you start questioning it it quickly falls apart and you have to deal with a bit of confirmation bias on what you have been told and taught for so long.
This is the first place I have found scientifically literate people who are willing to explain these topics without getting emotional.
Thank you all!
User avatar
bekateen
Posts: 8931
Joined: 09 Sep 2014, 17:50
I've donated: $40.00!
My articles: 4
My images: 130
My cats species list: 140 (i:102, k:37)
My aquaria list: 36 (i:13)
My BLogs: 44 (i:149, p:2653)
My Wishlist: 38
Spotted: 175
Location 1: USA, California, Stockton
Location 2: USA, California, Stockton
Contact:

Re: About filtration

Post by bekateen »

Boris wrote: 01 Aug 2020, 11:52This is the first place I have found scientifically literate people who are willing to explain these topics without getting emotional.
Thank you all!
That's why I like this site. I get so much good information and support.

Cheers, Eric
Image
Find me on YouTube and Facebook: http://youtube.com/user/Bekateen1; https://www.facebook.com/Bekateen
Buying caves from https://plecocaves.com? Plecocaves sponsor Bekateen's Fishroom. Use coupon code "bekateen" (no quotes) for 15% off your order.
Post Reply

Return to “Tank Talk”