Page 1 of 1

Need help identifying a wild-caught catfish

Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 18:06
by Norman Boyd
I fielded a call from a gentleman who described a catfish he had caught and wanted an ID. I have some experience with fish, including aquarium fish, and from his description it sounded like a Cory of some type. He described it as having hard scales, hard body, subterminal mouth, "pointy round nose", and black with yellow verticle bands. It was about 1.5 pounds. He caught it while cast-netting for bait near Victoria, TX in a bayou that connects to the Guadalupe River.

Does this ring a bell with anyone?

Norman Boyd
Port O'Connor, TX

Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 18:33
by Silurus
It's most likely not a catfish (no barbels were mentioned). I don't know of any 1.5-pound corys.

Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 18:41
by Norman Boyd
I had considered that possibility. I think I am familiar with all the local fishes so I eliminated those. The only fish I could come up with (without going to a book store) was a loach. I used to have some yellow and black striped loaches. The hard scales and body made me think of Corys. And, from my experiences, just because a "lay person" neglects to mention a key character doesn't mean it wasn't there. I really didn't know how big Corys got.

Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 21:45
by sidguppy
A really whoppin' huge barbatus-male would tip 4,5" or so, and a shorter but more heavy-build "C latus" would top 4".

They're small. Most are just around 2" or so, give or take a few mm.

Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 21:50
by Norman Boyd
Hmmm, maybe he had a Pleco?

Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 21:56
by sidguppy
That's possible, because feral Pleco's are rampant in the US!

these aren't striped black & yellow, however; maybe he had something else as well :roll: :wink:

like a few sixpacks?

Posted: 01 Jul 2005, 01:07
by Norman Boyd
Ahhh, that's it, a Budweiser Bass!

He is supposed to call me next time he catches one so I can drive up and take a look. Hope he saves some bait for me:)

Norm

Posted: 01 Jul 2005, 06:57
by Mike_Noren
FWIW, a clown loach (Botia macracanthus) grows to about a foot in length, is a very common aquarium fish, and fits the description.
http://filaman.uni-kiel.de/Photos/Thumb ... m?ID=10897

One thing to ask is if the fish had reddish tail fin and pectoral fins, whereas all other fins should be dark/have black in them.

Posted: 01 Jul 2005, 07:39
by DeepFriedIctalurus
I'd say it's most likely a or a hybrid between it & . There's no doubt these 2 species aren't kept seperate in Florida fishfarms, and that would explain why so many "common plecos" may not look quite like either species. Anyhow there was a pic of a fish caught in Texas in the cat E-log before under ambrosettii, and that fish could be described as having "black & yellow stripes" if it was a better colored individual. Due to it's uncertain origins & poorly matched patterning, i can understand why it was taken out. That fish may have been one of the possible hybrids I'm referring to.

I found a pic here that might help..
http://cars.er.usgs.gov/pics/db_nonfish0311.jpg

Posted: 01 Jul 2005, 09:16
by Jools
Just on the above post and (trying) not to go off topic, I've yet to see any evidence of hybridisation in these fish due to fish farming. I've looked into it twice now and twice we've ended up with a case of mistaken identify. I think it's more to do with the continual non-selective inbreeding of these fish rather than anything else that causes this. We're also not sure of what role P. multiradiatus plays in all this too.

Jools

Posted: 01 Jul 2005, 10:58
by Caol_ila
Hmm dont the scales rule out a loach?
Could the black/yellow bands be the stress coloration of a gibbiceps or some Hypostomus kind?

Posted: 01 Jul 2005, 11:26
by MatsP
Going back a bit on the CARS link above, you can search the Guadalupe river, and as a whole, it's got 43 species of (known) non-indigenous speceis.

See here.

Of those are particularly:
Hypostomus sp.
Hypostomus Plecostomus.

However, I'm almost certain that some of these species may well be misidentified species of other Loricardidae genera and species.

Of course, that doesn't at all mean that other non-indigenous (or even indigenous) species aren't available in the area that would match the rough description given above.

1.5 pounds of fish is a pretty decent size, probably about a foot long.

--
Mats

--
Mats

Posted: 02 Jul 2005, 15:23
by bronzefry
Do you think the caller could get a photo to you? This would be most helpful! :wink:

Posted: 02 Jul 2005, 17:22
by racoll
nothng like a catfish, but a distichodus fits the bill.

Image