Page 1 of 1
Why so little information on Chrysichthys longipinnis
Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 11:34
by Ransom
Chrysichthys longipinnis ( Aluminum catfish )
I have one of these i picked him/ her from a garden center about 6months ago
it just hides under a piece of bogwood all the time in my tank its not really grown much in those 6months either which is strage altho i never see it eating.
but there is very very little information on them?
does anyone have one themselves to post any pic's i will when i get home.
Ransom
Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 11:34
by Ransom
infact looking at my signiture its probably doubled in size

Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 13:37
by Marc van Arc
Ransom,
Very little information mostly indicates that only few people keep a certain species.
So if you have interesting info about your fish, why not mail that to Jools, who might add it to the Cat-eLog.
Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 13:45
by Ransom
thanks marc, ill get some nice pictures of my catfish and send them on maybe help others identify etc

Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 13:46
by MatsP
Or, to reduce the load on Jools (who has a few other things to keep him busy), you could post it in the "bugs and suggestions" section. If you use a "good" page as a template (for example
), you know which fields are available and what's usually in them.
Unfortunately, it's necessary to have someone with a bit of information to tell what should be said about each species, and if no one comes forward with information, there won't be any more info in the Cat-eLog, unfortunately.
I try my best to fill in information that I know is correct, but I don't know everything about all fishes!
--
Mats
Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 16:10
by Chrysichthys
Was it sold as Chrysichthys longipinnis? AFAIK what is sold as the Aluminum catfish is generally Chrysichthys furcatus. A picture would help confirm the I.D.
Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 16:19
by Ransom
yes it was sold as the Aliminium Catfish
but ive checked the only pic avaible and its almost identical
i think i have a good clear pic on my camera and will post it later for peoples comments
Posted: 11 Apr 2007, 17:01
by Ransom
Ok here's the fish, not the best pic i know but its clear enough

Posted: 12 Apr 2007, 14:36
by Chrysichthys
I think that is more likely to be Chrysichthys furcatus. The dorsal fin is too short for longipinnis. (The word 'longipinnis' refers to the long fin).
However in terms of husbandry there's no practical difference.