Page 1 of 1

Are my Synodontis petricola truly petricola, or lucipinnis?

Posted: 23 May 2007, 08:08
by garibaldi
I have had these fish for about two years. The females are about 4 inches long and the males 3 inches. When I bought them, they were sold as S. petricola. But now looking at the pages here, I'm wondering if they are really S. lucipinnis. They just spawned, and I have a few hundred hatching eggs (in a basket with fine mesh in the main tank).

Here are some pictures that will hopefully settle the ID.

First one:
Image

Same fish, different view:
Image

2nd fish:
Image

juvenile (unknown age, 6 mo?, 1.5 inches):
Image

ventral surface:
Image

trio:
Image

Thanks!!

Posted: 23 May 2007, 08:42
by Silurus
Yup, these are S. lucipinnis.

Posted: 23 May 2007, 12:46
by Richard B
Lucipinnis without a shadow of a doubt.

If you aren't aware of the recent revision of tanganyikan synos, these were known for years as petricola "dwarf" so the retailer was at the time correct.

Posted: 23 May 2007, 12:47
by Richard B
ps - can you please include your location in your details so we know where in the world you are?

Posted: 23 May 2007, 13:13
by garibaldi
Thanks very much for the ID. After looking at the pictures, I was pretty sure they were lucipinnis just because of the number of spots (petricola seems to have about twice as many smaller spots). Are there any other things you look for in telling these apart?

I'm in Norman, Oklahoma.

Here are the eggs and fry. I need a different camera to get them completely in focus.

Image

Posted: 27 May 2007, 14:53
by kwalker
what are the magor differances between the 2?