Page 1 of 1
New Baryancistrus
Posted: 11 Feb 2009, 22:22
by Silurus
Lujan, NK, M Arce & JW Armbruster, 2009. A new black Baryancistrus with blue sheen from the upper Orinoco (Siluriformes: Loricariidae). Copeia 2009: 50–56.
Abstract
Baryancistrus beggini, new species, is described from the upper Río Orinoco and lower portions of its tributaries, the Río Guaviare in Colombia and Río Ventuari in Venezuela. Baryancistrus beggini is unique within Hypostominae in having a uniformly dark black to brown base color with a blue sheen in life, and the first three to five plates of the midventral series strongly bent, forming a distinctive keel above the pectoral fins along each side of the body. It is further distinguished by having a naked abdomen, two to three symmetrical and ordered predorsal plate rows including the nuchal plate, and the last dorsal-fin ray adnate with adipose fin via a posterior membrane that extends beyond the preadipose plate up to half the length of the adipose-fin spine.
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 11 Feb 2009, 23:27
by CanadaPleco
sounds neat, any pics?
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 11 Feb 2009, 23:50
by Silurus
I have problems accessing my electronic subscription to Copeia, but I believe the species in question is L239.
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 12 Feb 2009, 00:26
by Silurus
I was able to view my subscription and confirm that B. beggini is L239.
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 12 Feb 2009, 01:13
by CanadaPleco
Cool. Figured it was that

Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 12 Feb 2009, 02:06
by Birger
That is interesting ...I always previously thought this might end up in its own genus.
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 12 Feb 2009, 07:48
by Jools
Birger wrote:That is interesting ...I always previously thought this might end up in its own genus.
Who's to say it won't...
Jools
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 04:17
by Birger
Birger wrote:That is interesting ...I always previously thought this might end up in its own genus.
Who's to say it won't...
Jools
Yes, very true.
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 09:49
by Jools
Got a copy of the paper this morning, it ends up by saying, "The assignment of the new species to Baryancistrus must therefore be considered as tentative until such time as a more thorough comparative study of basal genera within the Panaque clade can be conducted and several currently undescribed species that might also belong within Baryancistrus can be examined."
For trivia buffs, I wonder if this is first mention of a specific l-number in a description?
Jools
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 09:57
by husky_jim
Very interesting news!
Jools, is this paper available (or will be) to public?
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 10:06
by Jools
husky_jim wrote:Very interesting news!
Jools, is this paper available (or will be) to public?
I don't know.
Jools
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 14:06
by Haavard Stoere
I really love it when a favourite fish gets a real name

My LFS has a lot of them these days and I am considering to aquire a group. They are unically colorless, but have their charm nonetheless.
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 14:23
by Birger
Jools, is this paper available (or will be) to public?
Here is the abstract and site where it can be purchased
http://www.asihcopeiaonline.org/perlser ... FCI-07-187
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 14:52
by Haavard Stoere
Jools wrote:Birger wrote:That is interesting ...I always previously thought this might end up in its own genus.
Who's to say it won't...
Jools
Maybe both Baryancistrus demantoides and Baryancistrus beggini will end up in different genuses in the future.
Re: New Baryancistrus
Posted: 30 Mar 2009, 01:02
by Suckermouth
Jools wrote:For trivia buffs, I wonder if this is first mention of a specific l-number in a description?
Jools
I think I remember an L-number being referred to in a description before, but I can't remember what species... I'm thinking a Peckoltia or one of the small Panaque species.