Page 1 of 1
Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 03 Mar 2009, 16:38
by MatsP
Re: Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 04 Mar 2009, 20:30
by Jools
Do we?
Jools
Re: Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 05 Mar 2009, 09:12
by MatsP
The Dark one wrote:The heptapterid ichthyologist Flavio Bockmann has just come back to me. He confirms that it matches Imparfinis pseudonemacheir, but that species will probably be synonymised with Imparfinis stictonotus in the near future. So the fish in these images are Imparfinis stictonotus (which may end up back in Nannorhamdia!).
Of course, you may not agree, in which case that's OK.
--
Mats
Re: Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 05 Mar 2009, 09:41
by Martin S
Jools
I see you renamed sp(1), but it is now listed as Heptapterus pseudonemacheir, not Imparfinis pseudonemacheir - is this correct?
Martin
Re: Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 05 Mar 2009, 17:00
by Jools
No, had a lot of problems with uploads / admin work yesterday and this was one of the casualties it's fixed now.
Jools
Re: Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 22 Sep 2010, 21:42
by The.Dark.One
Just noticed you now have an image of a preserved I. stictonotus in the catelog. As advised above, I. pseudonemacheir will probably end up a synonym of stictonotus, and sp 1 which was renamed as pseudonemacheir does seem to match stictonotus also.
Re: Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 22 Sep 2010, 21:58
by MatsP
Current status in Catalog of Fishes is that I. pseudonemacheir is still valid, as is I. stictonotus.
I'm not saying you're wrong - they look very similar.
Is there a paper that is published that puts these into synonymy?
--
Mats
Re: Imparfinnis sp(1) ID..
Posted: 22 Sep 2010, 22:06
by The.Dark.One
MatsP wrote:Current status in Catalog of Fishes is that I. pseudonemacheir is still valid, as is I. stictonotus.
I'm not saying you're wrong - they look very similar.
Is there a paper that is published that puts these into synonymy?
--
Mats
No, it hasn't been published yet so I'm not suggesting merging the 2, just making comment for future really