corydoras species that have been bred
Posted: 21 Apr 2010, 18:02
There appear to be a number of cory species in cat-e-log where breeding is "unreported" although there appears to be reasonable evidence to the contrary - (either cat-e-log pictures or evidence from respected sources).
Would it be possible to to alter these to something like "has been bred - no specific detail available".
I just think from a neutral, new browsing persons perspective it seems odd to say "unreported" when photos are captioned " spawning act", "fry at a week old", fry at 20 days" etc.
Better still, we could ask for anyone who has bred cory species to submit a brief report (maybe even pics) to keep the species pages as up-to-date as possible. One of these species reported as being bred has no cat-e-log pic....
A few of us saw the bred "green lasers" at the CSG convention...
Species that spring to mind are...
cw009
cw010
cw016
c120
c129
c133
c150
c154
c areio
c garbei
c ornatus
c sarareensis
c shultzei
What do you think, is this a bit presumptuous? Is it a massive piece of work?
Would it be possible to to alter these to something like "has been bred - no specific detail available".
I just think from a neutral, new browsing persons perspective it seems odd to say "unreported" when photos are captioned " spawning act", "fry at a week old", fry at 20 days" etc.
Better still, we could ask for anyone who has bred cory species to submit a brief report (maybe even pics) to keep the species pages as up-to-date as possible. One of these species reported as being bred has no cat-e-log pic....
A few of us saw the bred "green lasers" at the CSG convention...
Species that spring to mind are...
cw009
cw010
cw016
c120
c129
c133
c150
c154
c areio
c garbei
c ornatus
c sarareensis
c shultzei
What do you think, is this a bit presumptuous? Is it a massive piece of work?