Page 1 of 1

Panaque cf. armbrusteri 'tocantins' incorrect images?

Posted: 13 Apr 2012, 18:07
by matthewfaulkner
I think that images 4 and 5 in the Clog are incorrectly placed and are . In all honesty I'm not sure about any of the images of Clog, but please don't read this as I'M RIGHT, YOU'RE WRONG. It's my understanding that is essentially a brown fish, and this is what I have always thought (and told) was a P. 'tocantins'

These are the same fish. I'd like hear what others think.

Image

Image

Image

Re: Panaque cf. armbrusteri 'tocantins' incorrect images?

Posted: 13 Apr 2012, 18:37
by MatsP
So, the images that are under question is:
image 4:
Image
image 5:
Image

Just for easy reference (if we move the images above, these links will stop working!)

--
Mats

Re: Panaque cf. armbrusteri 'tocantins' incorrect images?

Posted: 14 Apr 2012, 18:31
by matthewfaulkner
Thanks Mats, they are the two pictures.

Re: Panaque cf. armbrusteri 'tocantins' incorrect images?

Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 15:56
by Jools
Yes, I agree. They show the trademark white caudal peduncle ring. I've moved them.

Cheers,

Jools

Re: Panaque cf. armbrusteri 'tocantins' incorrect images?

Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 15:58
by Jools
BTW, we are low on pictures of this "species" - if you have more that we're able to use I would certainly use them.

Cheers,

Jools

Re: Panaque cf. armbrusteri 'tocantins' incorrect images?

Posted: 30 Jul 2012, 16:14
by Jools
I'm not sure about images one and two either...

Jools