Page 1 of 1

How did I do?

Posted: 09 Jun 2012, 17:28
by Vess
Hi Everyone, hope all are well?

I am new to the site but do frequent other forums. I am currently on a quest to purchase as many different cory as possible, the problem being I am moderately new to them and LFS are not the greatest when it comes to correct identification. I was wondering if you would not mind if I put the pictures I have taken with identifications for your approval - as in please tell me if you think they are something else. I have a couple of randoms that stumped us :-??

Mods if I have done something wrong please slap me appropriately. Heres the list of the ones I have managed to get a decent snap of.

1) Agassizii?

ImageImage

2) Panda

ImageImage

3) Sterbai

ImageImage

4) Venezuelanus

ImageImage

5) Concolor

ImageImage

6) Sodalis

Image

7) Schwartz

ImageImage

8) Arcuatus

ImageImage

9) Albino Bronze

Image

10) Trilineatus

ImageImage

11) Delphax

Image

12) Metae

ImageImage

13) Elegans

Image

14) Bronze (Aenus)

ImageImage

15) Pepper (Paleatus)

ImageImage

16) Duplicareus

ImageImage

17) Habrosus

ImageImage

18) CW021

ImageImage

19) Melanotaenia

ImageImage

20) Atropersonatus

Image

21) C.Ambiacus

Image

22) Simulatus

Image

Sorry if image heavy, any help much appreciated!

Best

Lee

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 09 Jun 2012, 18:59
by Jools
Pretty good Lee, I think 21 might be . May I ask where these pics were taken?

Cheers,

Jools
PS Learn to use the

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 09 Jun 2012, 19:46
by Vess

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 09 Jun 2012, 20:10
by minipol
I also like Corydoras a lot. I don't have any at the moment but i plan too.
Used to always have around 6 or 7 different species.
Nice selection you have there !

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 09 Jun 2012, 20:59
by Karsten S.
Hi,

most of the species are correctly labeled (including C. atropersonatus).

1) C. agassizii could something different, they usually have black colour in the dorsal.
18) is CW021.
21) I would also name this one C. ambiacus.

Cheers,

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 10 Jun 2012, 13:49
by Vess
kamas88 wrote:Hi,

most of the species are correctly labeled (including C. atropersonatus).

1) C. agassizii could something different, they usually have black colour in the dorsal.
18) is CW021.
21) I would also name this one C. ambiacus.

Cheers,
Hi Karsten - thanks for the help (To the others too!)

Are you sure on 18 being a cw021? I bought them off a reputable breeder who swears they are - would be good to tell him he's wrong ;)

For the last one, I recently picked up some of these - very very similar. Same species?

ImageImage

It was suggested they might be but I am not so sure. I think they look like the 9th Pic on the page. Again thanks for all the help :)

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 10 Jun 2012, 15:34
by Karsten S.
Hi Vess,
Vess wrote:Are you sure on 18 being a cw021? I bought them off a reputable breeder who swears they are - would be good to tell him he's wrong ;)
I have bred some hundreds of CW021 (had also C. axelrodi) and I am very sure that yours are as well CW021 although a second shorter dark band below is usually much more pronounced, in the second pick you can see it very faintly. This second band tends to join the main band in C. axelrodi whereas (as in your specimen) it's parallel.
If you want to be 100% sure ask the breeder for some pics of the fry with ~2 cm. CW021 has a completely black dorsal whereas fry of C. axelrodi does not. I have never seen adult C. axelrodi with such a black dorsal as yours.
For me: no doubt about them being CW021.
Vess wrote:For the last one, I recently picked up some of these - very very similar. Same species?

ImageImage

It was suggested they might be but I am not so sure. I think they look like the 9th Pic on the page. Again thanks for all the help :)
This might be the same species only at a different age but I think rather not. I still think that the other one was C. ambiacus as the black colouring only covers the bottom part of the dorsal which is quite typical.
They ones of your new pics are exported from Peru usually under the wrong name C. punctatus (which comes from Suriname and looks quite different). These are definitely no C. leucomelas.
But I'm not really sure what they really are and how many similar species we have. Their appearence changes quite a bit over time the spots tend to become smaller and the fish stockier when growing.

Cheers,

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 10 Jun 2012, 16:20
by Vess
Buddy that is fantastic information - thank you so much. I can see you being a huge help to me in the future if you do not mind.

Re: How did I do?

Posted: 30 Jun 2012, 18:33
by Vess
Hi again guys, I am just continuing my research and trying to learn as much as possible.

Viewing the first fish again, classed as - I to noticed the lack of pigmentation on the dorsal. Could these be to?

Could anyone else comment on the last photo I posted of the new recruits?

Thanks again for all your help.