It's a bit more complex than that.
Firstly the Sl given is for the species, as the species contains the two L-numbers, the max size is whichever was the larger. Bear in mind the SL given in the cat-elog is the largest reasonably verified SL. What is the origin of the the "fact" that L177 is smaller than L018? Was it the Planet data sheet? If not, then what?
Now, we have to deal in guesswork. Large L018 can be collected relatively easily, larger L177 would take a lot more effort because they are further away. If they looked really different, there would be more of a market for them but we don't see them - is that because no one collects them or because they look very similar to L018 as adults? If they look different, is the IBAMA positive list a barier to collection?
@Janne, might be best placed to be able to help with these questions.
Another issue with these plecos is very few people keep them alive for long enough for them to grow to adult sizes. The larger ones are imported large. Again, L018 is going to be a lot easier to do this with.
So, I'm happy to record that the L177 strain has not been recorded at larger sizes but it's too much of a leap (without more data) to say they don't get bigger given they're classified as the same species. Of course, we should dig into this, it is not beyond doubt that they are not one species.
The original thread title is great, and what we should focus on. Someone who has grown up both L018 and L177 and can say what they do and, better still, show it with pictures. I (or anyone!) could have a look at the 2011 paper and see if it gives sizes for what can be shown as L177.
BTW, does anyone know the sizes of the fishes
in this picture?
Jools