Hi all,
It will be published in "Nature", so it would be quite surprising if it wasn't a scientifically rigorous study.
Maartje A. H. J. van Kessel, Daan R. Speth, Mads Albertsen, Per H. Nielsen, Huub J. M. Op den Camp, Boran Kartal, Mike S. M. Jetten, Sebastian Lücker (2015). "Complete nitrification by a single microorganism"
Nature <
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vn ... 16459.html>.
I'm not surprised at all that novel bacteria are being discovered. Because scientists have access to libraries of DNA (and RNA) for bacteria (and archaea) it is now possible to actually look at the micro-organisms that are present in filters etc. Older microbiological techniques relied upon culturing bacteria and then identifying them with gram stains etc, which meant that you were only looking at a tiny sub-sample of the microbial diversity that was present.
I think "TwoTankAmin" is right, and very little of ecology (microbial or otherwise) is black and white, it is nearly all
shades of grey. I think recent research like this has shown pretty clearly that a much greater diversity of organisms is involved in nitrification that was originally thought, and diversity brings resilience.
MChambers wrote:I found it interesting that the article didn't even mention Archaea.
DNA/RNA libraries have shown that the archaea are some of the primary nitrifying organisms. Because they are very different from bacteria, at a fundamental level, this isn't going to be mistaken identity.
This paper is open access Sauder
et al. (2011) "Aquarium Nitrification Revisited: Thaumarchaeota Are the Dominant Ammonia Oxidizers in Freshwater Aquarium" <
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl ... 23281-g004>
cheers Darrel