Page 1 of 1

Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 09:42
by dicten
They were sold to me as L015, but after looking around, i think that they do not look like it 8-|
http://imgur.com/a/CDQJT

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 12:07
by Acanthicus
Hi,

thats not even a Peckoltia, but a Hypancistrus. I have some L 333 that look alike, not saying it is L 333.

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 15:35
by dicten
Well, shit.
Well, I dont think its L333 tho, as mine are much darker.

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 15:45
by stuby
I agree, it definitely appears to be a Hypancistrus. Possible L129 and a bunch of others out there..... better pictures would help with a ID and if possible at least where (country at least) they came from.

Chuck

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 16:00
by dicten
Yeah, sorry, hard to get pictures of the little buggers... Heres a few more:
http://imgur.com/a/HCSJW

Guess i'll have to take em out if i want better photos :P

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 16:53
by stuby
They still look a lot like L129's to me..... but there are a few that look similar to this also. If, for example they where imported from Brazil that would tell us they aren't L129's...... L129's are from Colombia. So knowing where they came from would help ID them. They appear to have what a friend of mine called "glasses"..... L129's have a line that goes from one eye to the other that kind of looks like he has glasses on.

HTH
Chuck

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 24 Nov 2016, 18:08
by dicten
Yeah, I'm heading back to the store tomorrow to ask them a few harsh questions. I might ask to return them...

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 19:48
by dicten
Store says they took in some L066, and that they are most likely that... If they are not, then they have no idea... Le sigh. Someone on another forum also suggested L173b, but as they are quite rare in europe, im thinking probably not? I would guess they are a common type, as the store took in quite a few, but maybe under a different type number. Someone dont know what they are doing....

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 21:08
by stuby
I should have asked this before....... how big are they?? Some smaller plecs look alike and are easier to ID when they are a little bigger.
If you like them and you are happy with what you paid for them that is really all that should matter...... not a number that was assigned to them. Some of my favorite plecs I got where miss ID'ed. I bought some that where labeled L129's that turned out to be L340's, L15's that where Peckoltia sp. "Zwerg", and some "unknown" plecs that where Peckoltia sp. Rio Tocantins...... and a few others.

Chuck

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 19:46
by dicten
They are quite small still, i´m guessing about two inches, tops. So yeah, they will be mysteryplecos until they get bigger! Yeah, I´m happy with them, I just wanted to read up on them to provide a good habitat and to see how big they will get, etc.

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 20:17
by Acanthicus
Hi,

pretty sure its not a H. debilittera or one of the complex around this species. It seems to be from the Xingu-complex - the wormlined ones. L 173b sometimes look like the specimens in question, sometimes they dont, so does L 333.

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 28 Nov 2016, 15:17
by dicten
Took some more photos of them, if it helps...
http://imgur.com/a/ZjTbk

Re: Are these in fact L015?

Posted: 29 Nov 2016, 16:58
by stuby
Acanthicus may very well be correct..... looking at the new pictures they do not look L129 like except the last one.

Chuck