Captivity paranoia
Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 05:00
I've been pondering this issue for quite a while.
Fishes in aquariums generally experience conditions that are quite different from those in natural habitats. For example, omnivorous fishes may partition their resources so that each species semi-specializes in certain foods to avoid competition; when in the tank, such fishes are often given similar diets and need not compete very much.
Of course, not all unnatural conditions produce negative results. But how many unintentional and troublesome side effects are our fishes (or even other non-fish pets) experiencing? For example, inbreeding in animals is well-known, and Practical Fishkeeping has stated that many fancy goldfishes suffer greatly from it.
But what if even well-outcrossed artificial color morphs suffer from invisible but significant pleiotropic effects? Such effects have been documented in melanistic Harmonia lady beetles and a Wikipedia-cited research article on frizzle-feather chickens. And might long-term breeding in commercial facilities cause problems from unconscious artificial selection to occur, such as an evolutionary trend towards lack of brainpower and lethargy-when-not-eating to take advantage of infrequent but heavy feedings? How are we supposed to not worry ourselves to death when many of the rare imports have almost nothing known scientifically about their biology, and so many "human errors" such as artificially-created ecological disasters have been made, apparently with the support of scientists?
Hard facts and extrapolation from zoos, history, etc. are appreciated.
EDIT: I may not be able to post much due to login-related things, so reply accordingly
Fishes in aquariums generally experience conditions that are quite different from those in natural habitats. For example, omnivorous fishes may partition their resources so that each species semi-specializes in certain foods to avoid competition; when in the tank, such fishes are often given similar diets and need not compete very much.
Of course, not all unnatural conditions produce negative results. But how many unintentional and troublesome side effects are our fishes (or even other non-fish pets) experiencing? For example, inbreeding in animals is well-known, and Practical Fishkeeping has stated that many fancy goldfishes suffer greatly from it.
But what if even well-outcrossed artificial color morphs suffer from invisible but significant pleiotropic effects? Such effects have been documented in melanistic Harmonia lady beetles and a Wikipedia-cited research article on frizzle-feather chickens. And might long-term breeding in commercial facilities cause problems from unconscious artificial selection to occur, such as an evolutionary trend towards lack of brainpower and lethargy-when-not-eating to take advantage of infrequent but heavy feedings? How are we supposed to not worry ourselves to death when many of the rare imports have almost nothing known scientifically about their biology, and so many "human errors" such as artificially-created ecological disasters have been made, apparently with the support of scientists?
Hard facts and extrapolation from zoos, history, etc. are appreciated.
EDIT: I may not be able to post much due to login-related things, so reply accordingly