Page 1 of 1

Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 06:50
by backstreetgambler

Re: Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 07:36
by Bas Pels
the summary is now onlinbe, but the whole article is not for free downloading :(

Re: Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 10:56
by racoll
It will show up on Research Gate soon enough I'm sure.

If not, I can post it.

Re: Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 15:52
by lfinley58
Hi,
I found the paper available on Nathan Lujan's site.
Enjoy!
Lee

https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/e12155_9 ... 8938b2.pdf

Re: Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 18:12
by TwoTankAmin
@lfinley58

Thanks for posting the link, Unfortunately, I got no joy from reading it. It only reinforced my long held beliefs about habitat destruction and species extinction in the Volta Grande.

What makes things worse, imo, is that the before and after studies were done pretty close together time wise. What I wonder is if this study were to be replicated in five years, what would he results look like then?

Re: Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 18:38
by racoll
What makes things worse, imo, is that the before and after studies were done pretty close together time wise.
This was not a "before and after the dam" study. It was about whether the fish communities differed between the different zones of the river.

Re: Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 11 Apr 2018, 23:19
by TwoTankAmin
You are right, I was wrong. The dam was not operational during the survey periods. However, construction was proceeding pretty much the whole time the surveys were conducted. So I wonder if any species had already been impacted by the early stages of construction and whatever nasty things that got sent into the river.

I was actually guilty of projecting from certain things that were highlighted in the study. Looking at what they wrote about rapids and how they will pretty much disappear in the upper and middle regions, I would assume that doing another survey today vs 2014 would already be showing changes in species abundances. Doing one once the dam has been fully operational over a couple of seasons should reveal that a lot of species are completely gone or are almost impossible to find in any significant numbers. This would be very probable in the areas of the upper dam's reservoir and the area of rapids below that dam.

They concluded that those areas where the most potential damage could occur due to the dam need special attention to preserve habitat and to prevent extinctions. I highly doubt they will get such treatment.
Because the instream reservoir is necessary for the hydropower potential of the BMHC, there is little that can be done for the conservation of rapids habitats in the upstream section. In fact, the two reservoirs currently built are projected to generate only a fraction of the full BMHC capacity.....

The sustainability boundaries approach to determining environmental flows (Richter, 2009), in which requirements are expressed as allowable percentages of deviation rather than particular volumes at given times of year, would aid in maintaining flow dynamics throughout the lower Volta Grande and lower Xingu.
Determining appropriate boundaries is a difficult process that is beyond the scope of this paper, but the roughly 80% reduction currently expected will likely leave insufficient flows for the maintenance of aquatic
diversity.
from the paper

They cannot power the dam to full capacity which means every drop allowed downstream costs them electric output. Does it make sense the dam management would be willing to reduce this even more so keep fish alive? This only makes environmental sense, not economic sense.

Re: Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River

Posted: 11 Apr 2018, 23:44
by racoll
I would assume that doing another survey today vs 2014 would already be showing changes in species abundances. Doing one once the dam has been fully operational over a couple of seasons should reveal that a lot of species are completely gone or are almost impossible to find in any significant numbers.
I think that's the plan. They now have a baseline of how things were before the main impacts of the dam take effect.

Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River:

Posted: 07 Jan 2019, 05:21
by TwoTankAmin
Daniel B. Fitzgeralda,⁎, Mark H. Sabaj Perezb, Leandro M. Sousac, Alany P. Gonçalvesc,
Lucia Rapp Py-Danield, Nathan K. Lujane, Jansen Zuanond, Kirk O. Winemillera,
John G. Lundbergb (2018) Diversity and community structure of rapids-dwelling fishes of the Xingu River: Implications for conservation amid large-scale hydroelectric development. Biological Conservation 222 (2018) 104–112
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9d1d/d ... ad1fc7.pdf
A B S T R A C T

A recent boom in hydroelectric development in the world's most diverse tropical river basins is currently
threatening aquatic biodiversity on an unprecedented scale. Among the most controversial of these projects is the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Complex (BMHC) on the Xingu River, the Amazon's largest clear-water tributary. The design of the BMHC creates three distinctly altered segments: a flooded section upstream of the main dam, a middle section between the dam and the main powerhouse that will be dewatered, and a downstream section subject to flow alteration from powerhouse discharge. This region of the Xingu is notable for an extensive series of rapids known as the Volta Grande that hosts exceptional levels of endemic aquatic biodiversity; yet, patterns of temporal and spatial variation in community composition within this highly threatened habitat are not well documented. We surveyed fish assemblages within rapids in the three segments impacted by the BMHC prior to hydrologic alteration, and tested for dfferences in assemblage structure between segments and seasons. Fish species richness varied only slightly between segments, but there were significant dfferences in assemblage structure between segments and seasons. Most of the species thought to be highly dependent on rapids habitat, including several species listed as threatened in Brazil, were either restricted to or much more abundant within the upstream and middle segments. Our analysis identified the middle section of the Volta Grande as critically important for the conservation of this diverse, endemic fish fauna. Additional research is urgently needed to determine dam operations that may optimize energy production with an environmental flow regime that conserves the river's unique habitat and biodiversity.
Keywords: Anostomidae; Assemblage structure; Belo Monte; Brazil; Cichlidae; Hydrologic connectivity;
Loricariidae; Rheophilic