Page 1 of 1
L129
Posted: 26 Dec 2013, 05:01
by JG
Looking to confirm whether the below is L129. Sorry for the poor quality photos, cell shots. Thanks for you assistance in advance.

Re: L129
Posted: 26 Dec 2013, 05:20
by Dave Rinaldo
They are not
(L129).
They look like
.
Re: L129
Posted: 26 Dec 2013, 07:42
by Suckermouth
I agree with Dave.
Re: L129
Posted: 26 Dec 2013, 14:53
by JG
Appreciate the feedback from both of you.
Starting to dive more into plecos but I've noticed that there seems to be a lot more mislabeled fish these days. I've noticed the same thing occurring with the West African dwarf cichlids as well.
Re: L129
Posted: 27 Dec 2013, 02:34
by JG
I spoke with the hobbyist who bred the fish and these are the parents of the above fish. She mentioned that she had kept the below fish with a pair of L144s and doesn't have any veiltail or brown BN plecos at all. Just wondering what some of you may speculate what occurred. Appreciate the feedback.
http://s174.photobucket.com/user/AhMega ... 2.jpg.html
http://s174.photobucket.com/user/AhMega ... 1.jpg.html
EDIT: The above two pictures are of the supposed parents.
Re: L129
Posted: 27 Dec 2013, 04:51
by Dave Rinaldo
They certainly are not offspring of
.
...L144 in the hobby isn't the 'true' L144.
This fish appears to be a form of Ancistrus cf. cirrhosus
.
That said, the babies are from her Ancistrus.
Re: L129
Posted: 28 Dec 2013, 03:16
by BlackSouL