Thanks

I'd keep them but I'm kind of bias. I'd ask this question on a new thread with the cory experts. Somewhere up on the title bar under 'forums', maybe "B.splendens/syno compatible?" There are many experts that keep an eye on that forum but it might not get a reply right away.Should I decide to keep these guys? I am planning on starting a 400 litre aquarium for my Brochis splendens. PH 7.2 Will they go nicely with the Brochis? L number banana I see that your hybrid is doing well in with your Corys so im hoping this will be fine.
I enjoy keeping, researching and basically anything to do with Synodontis, I will confirm Marc's earlier postsI wasnt searching for a "different opinion", I was searching for confirmation as advised by marc van arc. I didnt want to waste any time in getting an answer, for all I know they could have killed all my existing stock!
They would be okay with Brochis, this fish will grow rather fast and you should see a difference by the time your new tank is set up, with good conditions will get to 15 cm quite fast and then it's growth will slow some. Be aware of the eventual final size of these fish not overly huge but a full bodied eupterus with full finnage is quite a sight.The term SL after the measurement means from the tip of it's nose to the base of the tail, on these you could add another 5 cm at least for the tail itself.Should I decide to keep these guys? I am planning on starting a 400 litre aquarium for my Brochis splendens. PH 7.2 Will they go nicely with the Brochis? L number banana I see that your hybrid is doing well in with your Corys so im hoping this will be fine.
This tank wont be setup until maybe the new year. They are currently in a 125 litre. How quickly do they grow? Will they be ok where they are until the new home is ready?
You didn't. You got upset by a reply that was a bit harsh in your opinion. That's no problem, for knowing Mats a little it was not intended as such.flappinganimal wrote: I didnt mean to tread on anyones toes or to offend.
In my opinion, I think Mats reply was perfectly reasonable and the use of smiley in the bump was ambiguous. Everyone has however rushed in and smoothed things out as, reading this from a dispassionate / "helicopter view" it was just a case of getting the wrong end of the stick and I personally think Mats reply doesn't require any apology - he's one of our most active moderators and gives up hours of his time, for no money, to look after it for the rest of us. That gives him the right to point out why a post has not been replied to and indeed if he didn't then you'd just think everyone was ignoring you!Marc van Arc wrote:You didn't. You got upset by a reply that was a bit harsh in your opinion. That's no problem, for knowing Mats a little it was not intended as such.flappinganimal wrote: I didnt mean to tread on anyones toes or to offend.
Just stick around. It's worth it. Learn & enjoy!
Marc
I was also 99% sure, but that still leaves 1%. The problem with Synos nowadays is (hence my reply earlier) that quite a few hybrids have occurred in the last few years, which makes it more difficult to give a correct ID. And because I don't want to provide "false" information I asked for a confirmation of someone who's better at Synos than me. Therefore it's a good thing Birger joined in to do so.flappinganimal wrote:Just want to say marc if you hadnt said that we should wait for the syno pros I wouldnt have questioned your ID. I was 99% sure you were correct, the only hint of dout came from you having a hint of dout Cheers
Exactly. My advice is just to read the words at face value. When you can't see someone's face, or hear the tone of their voice, it is hard to gauge if they are simply being matter-of-fact or pissed off.andywoolloo wrote:Sometimes we interpret alot into the written word that isn't there.