Well, as hard as it is to believe, he is still hanging in there, and touch wood the rate of degredation on the ulcers and fins seems to have decreased.
I think I've really opened a can of worms here, even my wife is sitting next to me actually interested in what the forum is saying.
Next thing she'll be telling me it's ok to buy more fish and set up more tanks, wh-hey!
NOT! (ok thats my delightful wife speaking)
So it seems evident that there are many opinions on the use of broad range antibiotics for aquarium use. I understand the arguement against and correct me if we're wrong, but purelt focusing on the domestic aquarium. My fish gets cured, but in the process a bacteria has beomce reistent to the antibiotic used. This can lay dormant, until the fish is removed from the quarantine tank and introduced to other fish. Once this introduction takes place the "mutated bacteria" can then be spread throughout the tank and other tank / fish that comes in contact. i.e. through sale or passing on of fish.
SO, the primary problem is that this resistant bacteria is the resultant effect of in lamens terms," an antibiotic treatment cycle not being completed".
On the other side, quite simply, how can we learn if the practice is not carried out. I am about to fork out way more than the fish is worth (if you know what I mean), for a fish vet guy to come out and diagnose the fish. If he feels necessary, he will administer an appropriate antibiotic. Surely it is not in his best interst to promote the mis-use of anti-biotics. Which is why it is so difficult to get them for fish in this country. If I wanted to get antibiotic food for my fish, I would have to take him into the surgery(during which he would probably die anyway), and the vet may say, "hmmm...sorry I can't issue a treatment, because I don't recognise the symtoms, and cannot therefore make a diagnosis"
Basically, here in the UK there ARE controls in place, and if used responsibily the use can be justified. I am lucky in the sense that this specialist lives 40 miles away, and is probably more qualified than ourselves to decide on appropriate action.
The reasons for the strict controls are due to reasons stated by pturley,
Antibiotics that show a primary effectiveness against one type of bacteria (IE: Gram negative bacillus, and not coccus) can and do act as selective pressures in the Cocci-type bacteria (or spirochetes, or gram positive, or... ... OK, well you get my drift.). Then, given that bacterial conjugation (passing plasmid DNA between cells)of resistance factors is not a type specific activity and occurs between broadly differing strains and types of bacteria, YES, you are building a better bug by the use of antibiotics in aquarium fish.
Yet the means to cure the fish are created by people who ensure that there are regulatory restrictions, (even if not legislative), in place..
I therefore feel that this is justification, under the correct condtions......
Tell you what, this is getting interesting.
I just hope my L091 can sympathise with all of the theoretical bulsh*t that goes into trying to save his little wet life!
Where's Jerry Springer when you need him.

My wife made the mistake of buying me a 2 ft tank and it grew to 7ft.