Early impacts of the largest Amazonian hydropower project on fish communities

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 7773
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 5:50 pm
I've donated: $40.00!
My articles: 4
My images: 82
My cats species list: 125 (i:37, k:49)
My aquaria list: 30 (i:13)
My BLogs: 37 (i:125, p:1910)
My Wishlist: 39
Spotted: 152
Location 1: USA, California, Stockton
Location 2: USA, California, Stockton

Early impacts of the largest Amazonian hydropower project on fish communities

Post by bekateen »

Keppeler, FW, Andrade, MC, Trindade, PAA, Sousa, LM, Arantes, CC, Winemiller, KO, Jensen, OP, & T Giarrizzo. (2022). Early impacts of the largest Amazonian hydropower project on fish communities. Science of The Total Environment, 838(2), 155951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155951.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 9722030480
Hydropower is a threat to freshwater fishes. Despite a recent boom in dam construction, few studies have assessed their impact on mega-diverse tropical rivers. Using a before-after study design, we investigated the early impacts of the Belo Monte hydroelectric complex, the third-largest hydropower project in the world, on fishes of the Xingu River, a major clear-water tributary of the lower Amazon. We explored impacts across different river sectors (upstream, reservoir, reduced flow sector, and downstream) and spatial scales (individual sectors vs. all sectors combined) using joint species distribution models and different facets of diversity (taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic). After 5 years of the Belo Monte operation, species richness declined ~12% in lentic and ~16% in lotic environments. Changes in abundance were of less magnitude (<4%). Effects were particularly negative for species of the families Serrasalmidae (mainly pacus), Anostomidae (headstanders), Auchenipteridae, and Pimelodidae (catfishes), whereas no taxonomic group consistently increased in richness or abundance. The reservoir and downstream sectors were the most impacted, with declines of ~24–29% in fish species richness, overall reductions in fish body size and trophic level, and a change in average body shape. Richness and abundance also declined in the reduced river flow, and changes in size, shape, and position of fins were observed. Relatively minor changes were found in the upstream sector. Variation in functional and phylogenetic diversity following river impoundment was subtle; however, across sectors, we found a reduction in functional divergence, indicating a decline in the abundance of species located near the extremities of community functional space. This may be the first sign of an environmental filtering process reducing functional diversity in the region. Greater changes in flow and habitats are expected as hydropower operations ramp up, and continued monitoring is warranted to understand the full scope and magnitude of ecological impacts.
  • Keywords: Belo Monte; Hydropower; Joint species distribution models; Functional diversity; Phylogenetic diversity; Fish abundance
Would you like to buy my fish? Click HERE for prices.
Buying caves from https://plecocaves.com? Plecocaves is now sponsoring Bekateen's Fishroom. Use coupon code "bekateen" (no quotes) for 15% off your order.
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:07 pm
My cats species list: 1 (i:0, k:1)
Spotted: 2
Location 1: Boston
Location 2: Massachusetts

Re: Early impacts of the largest Amazonian hydropower project on fish communities

Post by Captainandy »

Belief me, I despise what’s going on in Brazil.
But, are any of these observations statistically significant. Without such analysis the observations don’t mean that much
Post Reply