Tiny organisms in substrate move to avoid being eaten by Corydoras aeneus

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
bekateen
Posts: 8996
Joined: 09 Sep 2014, 17:50
I've donated: $40.00!
My articles: 4
My images: 130
My cats species list: 142 (i:102, k:39)
My aquaria list: 36 (i:13)
My BLogs: 44 (i:149, p:2671)
My Wishlist: 35
Spotted: 177
Location 1: USA, California, Stockton
Location 2: USA, California, Stockton
Contact:

Tiny organisms in substrate move to avoid being eaten by Corydoras aeneus

Post by bekateen »

Wulfes, R., Traunspurger, W. & Ptatscheck, C. (2023). The armored catfish Corydoras aeneus shapes the meiofaunal community due to predation and disturbance-induced water column dispersal. Hydrobiologia, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05408-y
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10750-023-05408-y#Abs1
Abstract
Bottom-feeding fish can exert strong top-down pressure on benthic invertebrates while also causing mechanical disturbance of the sediment. In our laboratory study, we investigated the influence of predation and disturbance-induced water column emigration on meiofauna, triggered by the armored catfish . We hypothesized that both factors would significantly reduce the abundance of meiofauna, depending on their body size. Accordingly, we also expected a change in the nematode community structure. After 24 h, the abundances of nematodes, tardigrades, hydracarina, copepods and oligochaetes were significantly lower than in control aquariums without fish, in the latter two groups primarily due to predation. All other taxa were equally affected by predation and emigration. Within the nematodes, mainly large individuals (≥ 1 mm) were consumed, while smaller worms (< 1 mm) were increasingly dispersed. This, though it did not reduce species numbers, resulted in altered size and species composition. Our results show that the real top-down effects can quickly be overestimated as emigration of prey is overlooked and, on the other hand, that fish may also influence adjacent, undisturbed areas due to subsequent immigration of meiofauna.
Attachments
Fig. 1 Experimental setup. Fish were placed in the source<br />chamber with living sediment. After 24 h the sediment of both<br />chambers and the water column were sampled
Fig. 1 Experimental setup. Fish were placed in the source
chamber with living sediment. After 24 h the sediment of both
chambers and the water column were sampled
Fig. 3 Mean percentage (± SD, n = 5) of meiofauna taxa found<br />after 24 h in the DCs of the control (grey) and fish (white)<br />treatments. n.s. not significant, *P &lt; 0.05, **P &lt; 0.01 (Wilcoxon-<br />test)
Fig. 3 Mean percentage (± SD, n = 5) of meiofauna taxa found
after 24 h in the DCs of the control (grey) and fish (white)
treatments. n.s. not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (Wilcoxon-
test)
Image
Find me on YouTube and Facebook: http://youtube.com/user/Bekateen1; https://www.facebook.com/Bekateen
Buying caves from https://plecocaves.com? Plecocaves sponsor Bekateen's Fishroom. Use coupon code "bekateen" (no quotes) for 15% off your order.
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”