Dorsal fin spines of Chrysichthys auratus, Synodontis schall, and Synodontis serratus

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
bekateen
Posts: 8996
Joined: 09 Sep 2014, 17:50
I've donated: $40.00!
My articles: 4
My images: 130
My cats species list: 142 (i:102, k:39)
My aquaria list: 36 (i:13)
My BLogs: 44 (i:149, p:2671)
My Wishlist: 35
Spotted: 177
Location 1: USA, California, Stockton
Location 2: USA, California, Stockton
Contact:

Dorsal fin spines of Chrysichthys auratus, Synodontis schall, and Synodontis serratus

Post by bekateen »

Farrag, M.M., Jawad, L.A. and Park, J.M., 2023. Morphological comparison for the dorsal fin of Chrysichthys auratus, Synodontis schall, and Synodontis serratus (Teleosti: Siluriformes) collected from the Lake Nasser and the River Nile, Egypt. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 52(4), pp.420-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26881/oahs-2023.4.03
https://sciendo.com/article/10.26881/oahs-2023.4.03
Abstract
The anatomy, growth, and differentiation of the dorsal fin spines of three catfish species collected from the Nile River and Lake Nasser. Egyptian waters are described, and terminology is suggested for their parts. Features of the dorsal fin spine that change with growth are also described. The results showed that in all species studied, the dorsal spine is an elongate, compressed, tapered, slightly arched, osseous structure, bearing a series of retrorse dentations along the anterior and posterior surfaces and has a sharp sagittate tip. The retrorse, anterior dentations are most pronounced in the upper third of the spine and gradually alter in form until they appear as a series of distinct notches on the basal third of the spine. The anterolateral surfaces of the dorsal spine are marked by numerous short, irregular, shallow, anastomosing, longitudinal furrows. In three species (C. auratus, S. schall, S. serratus), the posterior process is poorly developed and directed laterally in young individuals and well produced and directed posteriorly in older specimens. In S. schall and S. serratus, the posterior blocking process of the large specimens has a wavy edge, while in S. serratus, it is curved in young individuals and straight in larger specimens.
Key words: Ostariophysi, fins, anatomy, growth and differentiation, taxonomic identification
Attachments
Figure 2. Dorsal fin spine of Chrysichthys auratus, 270 mm TL, A. anterior view; B. posterior view; C. spine elevated to show ventral side. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Figure 2. Dorsal fin spine of Chrysichthys auratus, 270 mm TL, A. anterior view; B. posterior view; C. spine elevated to show ventral side. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Figure 3. Dorsal fin spine of Synodontis schall, 400 mm TL; A. anterior view; B. spine elevated to show ventral side. Dorsal fin spine of Synodontis serratus, 400 mm TL, C. anterior view; D. posterior view. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Figure 3. Dorsal fin spine of Synodontis schall, 400 mm TL; A. anterior view; B. spine elevated to show ventral side. Dorsal fin spine of Synodontis serratus, 400 mm TL, C. anterior view; D. posterior view. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED
Image
Find me on YouTube and Facebook: http://youtube.com/user/Bekateen1; https://www.facebook.com/Bekateen
Buying caves from https://plecocaves.com? Plecocaves sponsor Bekateen's Fishroom. Use coupon code "bekateen" (no quotes) for 15% off your order.
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”