New Nanobagrus

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12460
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 896
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 428
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

New Nanobagrus

Post by Silurus »

Ng, HH, 2008. A New Species of Nanobagrus (Teleostei: Bagridae) from Southern Borneo. Copeia 2008: 93–98.

Abstract

Nanobagrus immaculatus, a new species of bagrid catfish, is described from the Kahayan River drainage in southern Borneo. Nanobagrus immaculatus is most readily distinguished from congeners in having a uniformly dark-colored body lacking pale spots or patches (vs. pale spots or patches always present), larger eye (16.7–18.2% HL vs. 9.0–16.1), and a longer adipose-fin base (24.9–26.6% SL vs. 12.8–21.6). The synapomorphies used to diagnose Nanobagrus are reviewed and re-examined. Pseudomystus fuscus is hypothesized to be more closely related to Nanobagrus than to all other Pseudomystus and is hereby reassigned to the former genus.
Image
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12460
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 896
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 428
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Re: New Nanobagrus

Post by Silurus »

This is Nanobagrus immaculatus. I have kept a small group for some time now. They superficially resemble short-bodied Amblyceps.
Image
User avatar
Dinyar
Posts: 1286
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 00:34
My articles: 3
My images: 226
My catfish: 10
My cats species list: 3 (i:10, k:0)
Spotted: 94
Location 1: New York, NY, USA
Interests: Mochokidae, Claroteidae, Bagridae, Malepteruridae, Chacidae, Heteropneustidae, Clariidae, Sisoridae, Loricariiadae

Re: New Nanobagrus

Post by Dinyar »

Hmm... I think I might have this fish, although mine might be stellatus. They disappeared into the undergrowth some time ago. Will have to dig them out and photograph them. Am I seeing a pattern here of fish showing up in the trade at about the same time you describe them? :)
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12460
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 896
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 428
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Re: New Nanobagrus

Post by Silurus »

I think it is more likely to be N. immaculatus than N. stellatus. I have seen hundreds of N. immaculatus passing through Singapore, but not any N. stellatus.
BTW, there are some quite large shipments of catfish from southern Borneo that have passed through here, including quite a number of undescribed species.
Image
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12460
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 896
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 428
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Re: New Nanobagrus

Post by Silurus »

I forgot to add that another result of this study is that Pseudomystus fuscus should now be corrected to Nanobagrus fuscus in the Cat-eLog.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”