I think the long silence means we need another clue. (Well I do anywayRichard B wrote:....c'mon this one is easy peasy lemon squeezy

I think the long silence means we need another clue. (Well I do anywayRichard B wrote:....c'mon this one is easy peasy lemon squeezy
Me too but I think Richard B is still enjoying his weekend. I'm always stumped on TV clues unless it's sports or nerd shows.torbanite:
I think the long silence means we need another clue. (Well I do anyway
Richard B wrote:
Pizarro's fish meets Ugly Betty!!!
It's got nothing to do with the Aztecs.....
Richard B, you've officially stumped everyone I think. But I've narrowed it down to 2999 possible fish.BUMP: - no more guesses???
Well done, just need to dismiss 2998 & the other one is your fish!!!L number Banana wrote:
But I've narrowed it down to 2999 possible fish.
So ... the odds are now 2998:1Richard B wrote:Again no...
Carp37 wrote:!
If this is the clue, I could do with another one.Carp37 wrote:stupid terminal adaptor gets randy
sorry, noL number Banana wrote:?
Well done Marc, your turnMarc van Arc wrote:
Platydoras hancockii???Marc van Arc wrote:New fish:
James Ubriacco would have loved this fish, but the chances of ever finding one alive are almost zero
That was a pretty good guess as well! I'm not too fond of taxonomists using this kind of flippant pop-culture naming to be honest (looking it up it i indeed named after batman)- I remember someone named a new mudskipper genus Zappa after Frank Zappa!Marc van Arc wrote:I know this can't be it, but it could have been: