Not a Schilbe

Post by **Silurus** » 15 Feb 2011, 13:12

Following on from Birger's Schilbe ID thread, the first photo in is not that of a Schilbe, but a blunt-nosed Eutropiichthys (probably E. britzi).

MatsP · Post by **MatsP** » 16 Feb 2011, 13:25

How certain are you about the E. britzi ID? What I'm trying to say is that should we just archive the picture, or should we add a E. britzi species?

--
Mats

YouTube · Post by **Jools** » 16 Feb 2011, 13:28

I'd be inclined to use E. sp(1) as opposed to straight archive?

Jools

MatsP · Post by **MatsP** » 16 Feb 2011, 13:38

That's another option of course.

--
Mats

Post by **Silurus** » 16 Feb 2011, 15:20

No reason why we cannot add it as E. britzi. The ID would be as accurate as the Schilbe intermedius I gave for Birger's photo (meaning that there would always be an element of uncertainty because of inability to examine internal characters such as gill rakers).

MatsP · Post by **MatsP** » 16 Feb 2011, 15:34

Understood.

I will try to add tonight.

--
Mats

YouTube · Post by **Jools** » 20 Feb 2011, 16:13

*bump*

Jools

MatsP · Post by **MatsP** » 20 Feb 2011, 16:29

ONIT!

--
Mats

YouTube · Post by **Jools** » 20 Feb 2011, 16:36

Jools

MatsP · Post by **MatsP** » 20 Feb 2011, 16:38

Done!

--
Mats

Not a Schilbe

Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe

Re: Not a Schilbe