We have Spix & Agassiz, 1829 but CoF & fishbase says (Lichtenstein, 1819)
I have changed it, but wanted to check if it's just a mistake or something else that I should know about?
--
Mats
Author on Cetopsis coecutiens
-
MatsP
- Posts: 21038
- Joined: 06 Oct 2004, 13:58
- My articles: 4
- My images: 28
- My cats species list: 117 (i:33, k:0)
- My aquaria list: 10 (i:8)
- My BLogs: 4 (i:0, p:164)
- Spotted: 187
- Location 1: North of Cambridge
- Location 2: England.
-
Birger
- Expert
- Posts: 3870
- Joined: 01 Dec 2003, 05:04
- My articles: 10
- My images: 112
- My cats species list: 49 (i:43, k:0)
- Spotted: 35
- Location 1: Edmonton,Alberta
- Location 2: Canada
Re: Author on Cetopsis coecutiens
I just checked this all out and seems to be correct now.
Moved to resolved.
Moved to resolved.
Birger
-
Marc van Arc
- Expert
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: 19 Dec 2004, 14:38
- My articles: 20
- My images: 61
- My catfish: 9
- Spotted: 35
- Location 2: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Re: Author on Cetopsis coecutiens
Not quite. The brackets indicate that it's not the original description.Birger wrote:I just checked this all out and seems to be correct now.
That small change has been made, but is not directly visible as it has to be vetted first.