Panaque cf. armbrusteri 'tocantins' incorrect images?

[matthewfaulkner]

I think that images 4 and 5 in the

Panaque cf_armbrusteri`tocantins`

Clog are incorrectly placed and are

Panaque sp(l191)

. In all honesty I'm not sure about any of the images of Clog, but please don't read this as I'M RIGHT, YOU'RE WRONG. It's my understanding that

Panaque cf_armbrusteri`tocantins`

is essentially a brown fish, and this is what I have always thought (and told) was a P. 'tocantins'

These are the same fish. I'd like hear what others think.

[MatsP]

So, the images that are under question is:
image 4:

image 5:


Just for easy reference (if we move the images above, these links will stop working!)

--
Mats

[matthewfaulkner]

Thanks Mats, they are the two pictures.

[Jools]

Yes, I agree. They show the trademark white caudal peduncle ring. I've moved them.

Cheers,

Jools

[Jools]

BTW, we are low on pictures of this "species" - if you have more that we're able to use I would certainly use them.

Cheers,

Jools

[Jools]

I'm not sure about images one and two either...

Jools