<br>

<em>O. hoppei</em> didn't exist when I added them to the Cat-eLog, now the images are not the greatest and I am not 100% they ARE .Mike_Noren wrote:Just out of curiosity, why is Otocinclus sp. 3 considered separate from Otocinclus hoppei in the CatElog?
IMHO..Mike_Noren wrote: As far as I can see Otocinclus sp. 3 fits Schaeffers description and photos of hoppei perfectly, but without having the fish in my hand and looking at it under a microscope I wouldn't dare say for sure.