Hypoptopoma ?? for Cat-eLog
- Silurus
- Posts: 12461
- Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
- I've donated: $12.00!
- My articles: 55
- My images: 896
- My catfish: 1
- My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
- Spotted: 428
- Location 1: Singapore
- Location 2: Moderator Emeritus
Re: Hypoptopoma ?? for Cat-eLog
Using the recent Aquino & Schaefer paper, I'm inclined to think H. thoracatum.

-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 25 Jun 2010, 13:44
- Location 2: Italy
Re: Hypoptopoma ?? for Cat-eLog
Hi.
This fishes was imported from Paraguay.So I think they are inexpectatum. Please note that they haven't the fat fin!
This fishes was imported from Paraguay.So I think they are inexpectatum. Please note that they haven't the fat fin!
-
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 21:40
- I've donated: $30.00!
- My articles: 1
- My images: 37
- My cats species list: 5 (i:0, k:0)
- Spotted: 9
- Location 1: Sweden
- Location 2: Sweden
Re: Hypoptopoma ?? for Cat-eLog
I tried to use Aquino & Schaeffers key to identify some Hypoptopoma in our museum collection, and I found it very difficult. Some of the characters, like the exact arrangement of small plates by the nares, was simply beyond my ability to see even though I had the fish under a stereo microscope.
Anyway, if this fish is from Paraguay, then it's likely inexspectatum; as far as I can tell it's the only described Hypoptopoma from that region.
H. inexspectatum can be reasonably easily identified by taking a head-on macro-photo of the snout: if it shows a very narrow, just a hairs width, band along the edge of the snout, then it's inexspectatum. The band is shown in figure 16 in Aquino & Schaeffer, but I'll see if I can take a photo of it for the Cat-eLog on monday. I'll also take a closer look at the very large Hypoptopoma from Paraguay we have in collection - if i remember correctly they look much like this one, with stocky bodies and strongly depressed heads.
EDIT: Presence/absence of adipose fin doesn't appear to be a particularly useful character for identifying Hypoptopoma.
EDIT2: I actually think the line on the snout is visible on the top fish:

Anyway, if this fish is from Paraguay, then it's likely inexspectatum; as far as I can tell it's the only described Hypoptopoma from that region.
H. inexspectatum can be reasonably easily identified by taking a head-on macro-photo of the snout: if it shows a very narrow, just a hairs width, band along the edge of the snout, then it's inexspectatum. The band is shown in figure 16 in Aquino & Schaeffer, but I'll see if I can take a photo of it for the Cat-eLog on monday. I'll also take a closer look at the very large Hypoptopoma from Paraguay we have in collection - if i remember correctly they look much like this one, with stocky bodies and strongly depressed heads.
EDIT: Presence/absence of adipose fin doesn't appear to be a particularly useful character for identifying Hypoptopoma.
EDIT2: I actually think the line on the snout is visible on the top fish:

-- Disclaimer: All I write is strictly my personal and frequently uninformed opinion, I do not speak for the Swedish Museum of Natural History or FishBase! --
- Birger
- Expert
- Posts: 3870
- Joined: 01 Dec 2003, 05:04
- My articles: 10
- My images: 112
- My cats species list: 49 (i:43, k:0)
- Spotted: 35
- Location 1: Edmonton,Alberta
- Location 2: Canada
Re: Hypoptopoma ?? for Cat-eLog
Thats great Mike, you seem to have confirmed what it came labelled as...are you reasonably certain now, or am I still waiting until monday?EDIT2: I actually think the line on the snout is visible on the top fish:
![]()
Birger
Birger
-
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: 25 Jul 2003, 21:40
- I've donated: $30.00!
- My articles: 1
- My images: 37
- My cats species list: 5 (i:0, k:0)
- Spotted: 9
- Location 1: Sweden
- Location 2: Sweden
Re: Hypoptopoma ?? for Cat-eLog
The line on the snout is allegedly only found in H. inexspectatum, and the only species known from Paraguay is H. inexspectatum. I'll have a look at reference material, but considering how hard a time I had identifying specimens the last time I tried it's unlikely that I'll be able to say this it's NOT H. inexspectatum. So, while it's a highly tentative ID I'd say you can run with it.Birger wrote:Thats great Mike, you seem to have confirmed what it came labelled as...are you reasonably certain now, or am I still waiting until monday?
-- Disclaimer: All I write is strictly my personal and frequently uninformed opinion, I do not speak for the Swedish Museum of Natural History or FishBase! --