Did you know fantastic help is an anagram of Planet Catfish? This forum is for those of you with pictures of your catfish who are looking for help identifying them. There are many here to help and a firm ID is the first step towards keeping your catfish in the best conditions.
These belong to a friend of mine. I understand they are wild caught from a Rift Lake specialist importer. They vary in terms of how spotted and streamlined they are. The barbels don't seem 100% right for
These 2 individuals (i take it pic 2 & 3 are the same fish) are not typical of any of the regular 'variations' of wild fish under the njassae tag. That said, it is stated they are wild caught & i think i can guess who has supplied them & if im right, i believe his fish are all genuine w/c unless stated otherwise . There is something about them that does look odd but im wondering if they have been captured from an area of the lake that is not a normal collection locale & its a regional varient?
I might summise that malawi synos are in a lesser position than tanganyikan ones were before the revision paper at the end of '06 which described lucipinnis, irsacae, etc. That is to say, without DNA testing etc we hobbyists can only really speculate
Lou: Every young man's fantasy is to have a three-way. Jacob: Yeah not with another fu**!ng guy! Lou: It's still a three-way!
I'm certain these are a genuine species if not absolutely typical of the majority of fish labelled njassae.
FWIW, my opinion is there is too much that is unknown about Malawian synos. That is, is there a single, highly variable species? Are there undescribed species or is this just speculation on our ( my) part? I just don't have the facts or knowledge to contribute more.
Lou: Every young man's fantasy is to have a three-way. Jacob: Yeah not with another fu**!ng guy! Lou: It's still a three-way!
The.Dark.One wrote:Well lets hope they get the same study that the Tanganyikan's got and then we should know.
Hopefully this comes sooner rather than later.
Richard B wrote:I'm certain these are a genuine species if not absolutely typical of the majority of fish labelled njassae.
FWIW, my opinion is there is too much that is unknown about Malawian synos. That is, is there a single, highly variable species? Are there undescribed species or is this just speculation on our ( my) part? I just don't have the facts or knowledge to contribute more.
I agree with your speculations. If Lake Tanganyika has so many different Synodontis it seems only reasonable that Lake Malawi has more than the 1 or 2 described.